Laserfiche WebLink
1' <br />• <br />hki <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />JULY 17,2000 <br />ROLL <br />The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: <br />Acting Chair Sandy Smith, Commissioners Jay Nygard, William Stoddard, Dale Lindquist, and <br />Daniel Kluth. Commissioners Elizabeth Hawn and Janice Berg were absent. The following <br />represented City Staff; Senior Planning Coordinator Michael Gaffron, Zoning Administrator <br />Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator Wendy Bottenberg, and Recorder Jackie Young. <br />City Council Representative Richard Flint was present. <br />Acting Chair Smith called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. <br />(«1) 2597 DENNIS KRIJMP, 25 STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH - VARIANCES, <br />6:31 p.m. - 6:34 p.m. <br />Dennis Krump, Applicant, was present. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Bottenberg stated the Applicant is proposing to construct on addition to the south side of his <br />residence which involves tearing down of an existing dining room that currently docs not have <br />a foundation under it. The Applicant would like to construct a foundation and above it a dining <br />room and three season porch in the same location where the deck is currently located. The addition <br />will be slighMy larger than what currently c.xists because the walls arc being bumped out to be in <br />alignment with the c.xisting residence. <br />Bottenberg noted the residence was originally constructed in 1963, with the proposed section to <br />be removed being built in 1968. Both occurred before current zoning standards were adopted. <br />Bottenberg stated structural coverage is not an issue with this application, with no impact to the <br />adjoining neighbors by the setback. There is not an issue with the well or septic system. <br />The Applicant is requesting variances to the front yard setback to permit a setback of 42' for <br />an addition where 100' is required and a variance to permit a side yard setback of 24.2' for an <br />addition where 50' is required. <br />Cit>' Staff is recommending approval of the application <br />Krump indicated he has no comment regarding his application. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Lindquist commented he docs not have a problem with this application. <br />Smith stated she would prefer to sec the side yard setback stay the same as what currently exists. <br />Stoddard commented the Applicant is proposing to increase the encroachment into the setback <br />by 3.3 feet. <br />PAGEl <br />iHik