08-21-2000 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

t F minutes of the ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JULY 24,2000 t2600 BRIAN KERBER, Continued) Pctcrsofh«iatcd a hardship in her view is inherent to the land and not the need for additional storage spacer Mayor Jabbour comm! possible. led he would like to see the properties in Orono be as uncluttered as Sansevere moved, Jabbour secondt<^to approve the variance to permit construction 2,160 square foot pole barn and a varW to the street lot line for the property located at 740 Orchard Park Road, with the stipulation bfeiqs that if the Applicant wishes to exercise his right as presently exists in the Ordinance t^eqnstruct an additional shed, that building must comply to City standards, and with the under^bqiding the Applicant will store his vehicle and trailer inside the newly constructed structurb^^ furthc- with the understanding that the existing two-stall garage will be relocated as far baoNtj^ possible. Jabbour commented in his view the hardship is based on the land and thc'Applicant relinquishing his right to construct four structures on his property. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays I, Peterson Opposed. Peterson stated in her view there is no hardship inherent with the land a.nd that the Applicant shot {HI) JAMES ANDERST- NARROWS SALOON, 3380 SHORELINE DRIVE - PERMIT REVIEW James Anderst, Applicant, was present. Weinberger stated the Citv of Orono has issued a building permit to the .Applicant to allow the additional remodeling of the Narrows Saloon which includes expanding the bar into the former Minnetonka Photo space, which is now vacant. Tliis property is located in the B-1 Retail Sales Business District in which a Class 11 Restaurant is defined as a rcstaura.nt which serves intoxicating liquor or has live entertainment. Weinberger stated the expansion of the building r..^r in nKt-im n rruiHliinn.'il usc Dcrmit sincc Class II Restaurants arc allowed byrequires the ow ner to obtain a conditional usc permit since a conditional usc permit. The applicant has made a formal application for a conditional usc permit, but would technically be considered to be an after-the-fact application since the owner was permitted to proceed forward with the remodeling and c.xpansion of the restrooms, Weinberger stated the proposed expansion meets all setback requirements for the B-1 District, with no change to the footprint of the building except for the small expansion to the restroom area. Weinberger stated the expansion to the restroom is needed in order to make the restrooms handicap accessible. Subsequent to issuance of a building permit. Staff dctcmiined that a conditional use permit is Page 6