Laserfiche WebLink
II <br />TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />FROM: Wendy Bottenberg, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner <br />DATE: June 19,2000 <br />SUBJECT: U2S9\ Gina Hansen <br />583 Park Lane <br />Variance — Public Hearing <br />Zoning District: <br />Lot Area: <br />LR-1B One Family Lakeshore Residential District (I acre) <br />9,500 s.f. ( .219 acre) <br />List of Exhibits <br />A Analysis Worksheet <br />Application/Applicant Letter <br />Site Plan/ Survey <br />Hardcover Calculations <br />Plat Map <br />Photo of Property <br />Location Map <br />Floor Plan <br />Property Owner ’s List <br />Permit Record <br />B <br />C <br />D <br />E <br />F <br />G <br />H <br />I <br />J <br />Pertinent Code Secti^ s <br />1. Section 10.24, Subd. 5 (B): Side Yard Setback : The minimum requirement for side yard setback <br />in the LR-IB zoning district is 10*. Variance Request: To permit a side yard setback of 3* for a <br />second story expansion where 10' is required. (Existing first story on the north property line is 3* <br />from the lot line). <br />Application Summary: The applicants are proposing to change the use of a 4* x 18' section of <br />the existing covered deck and adding a second story to the back (street) portion of the existing <br />residence. The scope of the project involves removing the roof, changing a 4' x 18' section of the <br />deck (south side) into living space, extending the deck (outside) wall up to a second story which will <br />be over the back portion of the existing residence. The second story addition will be approximately <br />255 square feet. The first story walls and foundation will remain. The roof line will be higher than <br />presently exists on the back portion of the residence, but within City zoning code requirements. <br />Average lakeshore setback is not an issue with this application. <br />Background: The plans and description of the request reflect this proposed addition plus another <br />on the street side of the residence. After reviewing the application, staff discussed hardcover <br />calculations and structural coverage on the lot with the applicant. Explaining to the applicant the <br />hardcover calculations were not changing, however the structural coverage on the lot was increasing <br />#25P/ Gina Hansen <br />383 Park Lane <br />Variance <br />6/19/2000 <br />Page ! <br />ti <br />j