My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-19-2000 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2000
>
06-19-2000 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2023 4:06:36 PM
Creation date
3/16/2023 3:59:25 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
297
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Only the City Council can approve sanitary sewer service to buildings outside the MUSA, hence this <br />is an issue that should be left for Council review. (To sununarize the issue: in 1996 the City was <br />granted by Met Council the ability to connect up to 50 existing residences adjacent to existing sewer <br />lines outside the MUSA. The City Council established that such residences must have an existing <br />failing system with no replacement possibilities. The Council has also considered that existing non- <br />residential uses such as churches should also be connected to sewer when feasible. The Woodhill <br />bam does not meet the criteria for use of the SO units because it is not a residence, and while it has <br />a non-conforming system due to the 3' separation issue. At the same time, however, this is <br />ftmctionally an institutional/kitchen/quasi-commercial type of use which should be connected to <br />sewer. Staff will be recommending to Council that the bam be allowed to connect to sewer, which <br />is on the same tax parcel as the bam and only about 400' away.) <br />State Code requires a minimum setback to the septic tanks of 10' for stmctures. Staff has measured <br />the tanks to be approximately 28' from the bam. A19' addition to the building would place the tanks <br />approximately 9' from the new stmcture. This does not meet the State requirement for setback <br />distance to the building. Most of the soil around the building has been disti^rbed due to the <br />paddlecourt locations, driveway and parking areas, and the practice greens. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit to allow expansion of the building by 988 <br />s.f. and to proceed to the July 10,2000 City Council meeting subject to the following conditions: <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />binal grading and erosion control plans shall be approved by the City Engineer. <br />Access for all contractors and equipment shall use the County Road 15 entrance to the <br />County Club. <br />The building shall meet Fire Code protection standards. <br />The building shall meet the minimum 10' setback to the septic tanks. <br />Evidence of a standard septic system to accommodate the proposed use of the building or <br />connection to sanitary sewer only if approved by the City Council. <br />Planning Commission Options for Action: <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />Recommend approval of the preliminary plan and forward to the Council. <br />Recommend denial, stating reasons. <br />Table, requesting further information and provide direction to the applicant. <br />Other Action. <br />»2$S9 Woodhill Country Club <br />200 Woodhill Avenue <br />Conditional Use Permit <br />JuiH 19. 2000 <br />pagt-3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.