My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-15-2000 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2000
>
05-15-2000 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2023 4:03:32 PM
Creation date
3/16/2023 3:58:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
193
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MINUTES FOR APRIL 17,2000 <br />(#2572 Steve Morkrid, Continued) <br />Morkrid indicated they would like to add another bedroom to accommodate a new set of twins. <br />Dan Lager, Contractor, stated the proposed addition will help to improve the appearance of the <br />house and eliminate the leaking currently being experienced into the house. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Hawn moved, Nygard seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2572, Steve <br />Morkrid, 2314 Shadywood Road, granting of variances to lot coverage, lakeshore <br />hardcover and front yard setback to permit remodeling of the second floor and raising <br />of the roof line, subject to the condition that the existing hardcover, structural coverage <br />and front yard setback not exceed what is currently existing on the property. <br />VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />(#11) #2573 DAVID AND MARTI BLODGETT, 1380 REST POINT ROAD - VARIANCE, <br />9:40 p.m. - 9:58 p.m. <br />David Blodgett. Applicant, was present. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affadavit of Publication were noted. <br />Bottenberg stated the Applicants are requesting approval of a height variance for a six feet <br />privacy fence located in the rear yard of a lakeshore lot that does not abut a major thoroughfare. <br />Rest Point Road is not considered a "major thoroughfare". Since the fence exceeds the allowed 3.5 <br />foot height. City Code requires that It meet the rear yard setback of 30 feet. The Applicant has <br />designated on a survey the area requiring variance approval, which is a section beginning from the <br />street lot line and continuing along the southeast side lot line. The fence along the street lot line <br />will not exceed 3.5 feet. <br />Bottenberg stated some posts and some of the fence boards have already been installed, noting <br />the City Building Official did request that the Applicant cease all work until the necessary variance <br />approvals were received. <br />Bottenberg stated in 1989, a height variance for a six foot fence was granted to the property owner <br />at 1374 Rest Point Road, and in 1996, a height variance for a 6 to 6 1/2 foot fence was granted to <br />the property owner at 1375 Rest Point Road. <br />City Staff is recommending approval of a height variance to construct a fence. <br />Blodgett stated where he is requesting the six feel height variance is on the side of the property. <br />Blodgett indicated they had commenced the project In good faith based on some information <br />received from the City, which apparently the City has since changed requiring a 30 foot setback. <br />Kendall Nygard expressed concerns regarding the number of fences being constructed along <br />Rest Point Road and the tunnel effect that is being created Nygard stated Rest Point Road Is a <br />steep and narrow road, with the fence proposed by the Applicant possibly causing a driver ’s line of <br />vision to be impaired as they come over the hill. <br />Hawn pointed out the fence in the front will be 3.5 feel in height, with the request for the variance to <br />the fence being constructed on the side property line, which may block a person's view of the <br />Page 21
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.