Laserfiche WebLink
In 1996 the applicants submitted a proposal for a garage addition and deck at the northwest comer <br />of the existing residence. The application was tabled due to issues regarding phasing the addition <br />and removal of the driveway. The application did not proceed to the City Council. <br />Review Exhibit D, applicants’ property is identified at No. 5 on the map and is the next to the last <br />property served by the private ^ve. The property defined as No. 4 on the map obtained a building <br />permit for a new residential constmction in 1 and has been assigned a Tonkaview address. The <br />applicants should also change their address to Tonkaview Lane with the relocation of the access to <br />the property. The property is located within 500' of Lake Minnetonka. <br />The garage/room addition will result in an increase of stmctural coverage on the lot to 2,139 <br />s.f (11.8%), where 1,260 s.f (6.9%) exists and 2,710.95 s.f. (15%) is allowed. <br />The garage/room addition and deck will result in a decrease of hardcover coverage in the 75- <br />250' setback area to 0 s.f. (0%), where 6,234 s.f. (28%) exists and 1,558.5 s.f. (25%) is <br />allowed. <br />The garage/room addition and deck will result in an increase of hardcover coverage in the <br />250-500' setback area to 3,540 s.f. (29.9%), where 2,475 s.f. (21%) exists and 3,551.7 s.f <br />(30%) is allowed. <br />Tlie lot is a through lot, defined as a lot which has a pair of opposite lot lines abutting two <br />substantially parallel streets, and which is not a comer lot. On a through lot, both street lot <br />lines shall be front lot lines for zoning purposes. For this application, the front yard setback <br />variance is for Park Avenue. Park Avenue has been used as an alley in the past, however <br />for this application it is considered a street. The garage/room addition will be located 10' <br />from the property line where 35' is required. <br />Statement of Hardship; <br />The applicants have included their statement of hardship in Exhibit B. The applicants should also <br />be asked for tlieir testimony regarding this issue. <br />Issues for Consideration; <br />1 .The pattern of residences accessing from Tonkaview Lane is consistent with adjacent <br />properties. <br />2.The applicants’ driveway is the next to the last driveway at the west end of the drive which <br />will now serve a totd of six properties. This driveway is 600' long and privately maintained <br />within the platted right of way. At this level of use, is there any neighborhood or City support for <br />the City taking over its maintenance? <br />It2582 Francis/Susan Ann Koubsky <br />4784 North Shore Drive <br />Variance <br />5/15/2000 <br />Page 2