Laserfiche WebLink
%* £~ • ■ m ^ ' • . - . *V . . *. -.o* * . . -.. <br />ikMm <br />'^i(- <br />lJr\- <br />J.A;-*!’ <br />ul^... <br />&■ <br />s-v <br />m-'' <br />i-t'i' <br />Vf# ••. <br />ffu*-. <br />AXNUTES op the planning commission meeting held august 19, 1985. PAGE 3 <br />#941-1946-1951 2739 5HADYWOOD RD. continued <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the question is hov <br />to deal with the non-conforming use of these properties. <br />Mabusth noted that the City has been aware of the non- <br />conforming use of these lots since the late 50's. Mabusth <br />gave a short background as to when these lots were purchased <br />by the applicants’. Mabusth indicated that because the <br />applicants’ are non-adjacent property owners creates the <br />illegal non-confcrr.ing use, which has been a non-conforming <br />use fer the past 30 years. Mabusth als'^ noted that come of the <br />tracts have been co.mbined and some have not. <br />All three applicants indicated that their request is to be <br />allowed to use the lots for boat dockage. In order to do this, <br />the City must recognize them as a legal ."jon-conforning use. <br />Rovegno questioned, since back in 1955 this use was <br />apparently a legal thing to do, at what point did it become an <br />illegal use? <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth indicated the change occurred <br />in 1967, when the formal zoning cam.e in. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the Planning <br />Commission is being asked toaddresu two things: 1) recognize <br />these lots as a legal non-confornirg use 2) grant conditional <br />use permits because these lots have accessory structures <br />with no principal structure. <br />Mr. Ogle stated that issues to be considered are that the <br />applicants' want to change the conformity of the lots, the <br />lots were intended for residents, parking and access <br />problems for guests, and the problem with regulating the use <br />and number of boats being docked. <br />A person from the public stated that the LMCD allows one boat <br />per 100 feet of lakeshcre and the lots in question are 20 foot <br />lots. <br />Tom Frahm, Chairman of the Karina Committee, stated that the <br />Karina Committee found a problem with the number of boats and <br />ownership of boats. Frahm stated that the real problem is <br />that the Karina Committee felt they could not deal with the <br />dockage problem without a legal definition of what these <br />pieces of property arc, which is why it is before the Planning <br />Com.mifsion. <br />Rovegno wanted to m.ake clear the Planning C ,'.mission' n <br />issues in this ratter which is a conditional use permit to <br />allow an accessory use absent a principal use and variances <br />because the lots arc sub-standard under the terms cf today’s <br />zoning review. Rovegno felt that is what probably a <br />reasonable use because it has been dona for over 30 years. <br />Rovegno questioned whether these docks have permits from the <br />I.MCD. <br />1 <br />\ <br />_ ______ •