04-17-2000 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION minutes for FEBRUARY 23. 2000 (#2558 Anthony Patterson, Continued) 15.7 percent. Patterson stated he will reduce the side entry if necessary. Hawn stated the consensus of the Planning Commission is to leave the structupdTcoverage at the existing 15.7 percent. Nygard indicated the Applicant will need to remove 43 square feet inpfoer to reduce the proposed structural coverage to 15.7 percent. Nygard inquired whetherthepdveway should be •■emoved. Kluth commented he would like to see the numbers for hai the existing numbers. iver and structural coverage kept at Hawn inquired why structural coverage increasesjPfhe deck is being reduced Bergman stated the driveway was part of thp^^ginal proposal and apparently has not been removed from the calculations. Kluth stated they need to get the application. feet hardcover and structural coverage numbers on this Hawn commented it appeals the hardcover Is less than 43.7 percent. Kluth stated he wouldlike some assurance from the Applicant that the existing hardcover and structural covera^limits will not be increased. Kluth stated the Applicant will need to calculate the correct nprfibers prior to appearing before the City Council. Kluth nlwed, Hawn seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2558, Anthony Pa^t^on, 1780 Shadywood Road, granting of variances to lot coverage, and side yard ^ jwack, with the understanding that all existing hardcover and structural coverage limits will not be exceeded, and subject to the submittal of a new survey showing the revisions to City Staff for approval prior to issuance of a building permit. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. NEW BUSINESS (#5) #2486 ELAINE ERICKSON. 1270 SPRUCE PLACE - VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 7:38 p.m. - 8:26 p.m. Certificale of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Nancy Anderson, Daughter, Jeff Olson. Son. and Al Hirsch. Contractor, were present. The Applicant was not present. Bottenberg stated the Applicant is requesting variances to remove an existing residence and build a new residence further back on the same lot. The Applicant is also applying for a conditional use permit to permit grading within 75 feet of the lakeshore. The Applicant is proposing to remove a "bulge" in the topography to bring the lakeside of the lot more in natural flow with the adjacent property. The proposal includes relocating the new residence back out of the 0-75* setback area, which will allow it to be more in alignment with the adjacent properties. Bottenberg stated the Applicant Initiated this process in April of 1999. when the Applicant brought Page 7