My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-17-2000 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2000
>
04-17-2000 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2023 3:56:26 PM
Creation date
3/16/2023 3:46:35 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
445
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19, 2000 <br />|2550 Charles Van Eeckhout, Continued) <br />KlumSwted City Staff is recommending tabling this application until these issues are resolved, <br />Van Eeckfft^^t commented he would like the Planning Commission to act on his application <br />tonight. <br />Hawn inquired whel^r the ten percent slope for the driveway is an issue. <br />Van Eeckhout stated thXis not an issue. <br />Smith inquired whether the rribmbers of the Planning Commission preferred six lots with a <br />24 foot roadway or seven lots whlta 24 foot roadway. <br />Stoddard indicated he preferred the shUots. <br />Kluth stated based upon the conditions staKtf by City Staff, the developer may need to reduce <br />the number of lots. <br />Weinberger stated this is another application that ^H^eed to be extended. Weinberger stated <br />City Staff would be comfortable with sending this appnution to the City Council provided some <br />direction is given to the Applicant on the conditions he snq^d comply with. <br />Barrett noted the Planning Commission has suggested the de^^per consider reducing the <br />number of lots to six on a couple of occasions, with the developeS|ndicating he preferred to <br />leave the number of lots at seven. Barrett stated the Planning ComH^ion could vote to deny <br />this application, with clear direction on what the Planning Commissioi^^j^uld like to see occur <br />on this application. <br />Kluth moved. Smith seconded, to recommend denial of Application #2551^20 Brown <br />Road South, Subdivision for Planned Residential Development, with a strona <br />recommendation the developer consider reducing the number of lots within tl <br />subdivision to six in order to comalv with the conditions outlined in the Januar^O. 2000 <br />banner's Report'.* \z6tIE: Ayes 6, Nays 0.' <br />(#4) #2555 HENNEPIN COUNTY, 3880 SHORELINE DRIVE, ZONING CODE AMENDMENT, <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCES, 8:25 p.m. > 9:20 p.m. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted <br />Guy Nijwian and Greg Chock appeared on behalf of Hennepin County. <br />Weinberger stated the Hennepin County Transportation Department Is proposing to construct <br />a Hi-Arch gambrel type salt storage building at the maintenance facility located at 3880 Shoreline <br />Drive. The present facility was constructed at a time when the property was zoned for <br />commercial uses. However, that zoning was changed to residential in the early 1970s. thus <br />making use of this property a legal non-confonming use. Hennepin County has made an <br />application to the City of Orono requesting a code amendment that would allow a county <br />maintenance facility to exist in the LR-1C zoning district as a conditional use. The LR-1C district <br />permits any conditional use that is permitted in the R-1A zoning district. <br />Weinberger indicated the property Is presently used for salt/sand storage in the fall and winter <br />Page 13 <br />B
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.