My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-20-2000 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2000
>
03-20-2000 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2023 3:51:26 PM
Creation date
3/16/2023 3:45:54 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 23. 2000 <br />(#2558 Anthony Patterson, Continued) <br />15.7 percent. <br />Patterson stated he will reduce the side entry if necessary. <br />Hawn stated the consensus of the Planning Commission is to leave the structural coverage at the <br />existing 15.7 percent. <br />Nygard indicated the Applicant will need to remove 43 square feet in order to reduce the proposed <br />structural coverage to 15.7 percent. Nygard inquired whether the driveway should be removed. <br />Kluth commented he would like to see the numbers for hardcover and structural coverage kept at <br />the existing numbers. <br />Hawn inquired why structural coverage increases if the deck is being reduced. <br />Bergman stated the driveway was part of the original proposal and apparently has not been removed <br />from the calculations. <br />Kluth stated they need to get the correct hardcover and structural coverage numbers on this <br />application. <br />Hawn commented it appears the hardcover is less than 43.7 percent. <br />Kluth stated he would like some assurance from the Applicant that the existing hardcover and <br />structural coverage limits will not be increased. Kluth stated the Applicant will need to calculate <br />the correct numbers prior to appearing before the City Council. <br />Kluth moved, Hawn seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2558, Anthony <br />Patterson, 1780 Shadywood Road, granting of variances to lot coverage, and side yard <br />setback, with the understanding that all existing hardcover and structural coverage limits <br />will not be exceeded, and subject to the submittal of a new survey showing the revisions <br />to City Staff for approval prior to issuance of a building permit. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />NEW BUSINESS <br />(#5) #2488 ELAINE ERICKSON, 1270 SPRUCE PLACE - VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE <br />PERMIT, 7:38 p.m. • 8:26 p.m. <br />Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Nancy Anderson. Daughter, Jeff Olson. Son. and Al Hirsch, Contractor, were present. The Applicant <br />was not present. <br />Bottenberg stated the Applicant is requesting variances to remove an existing residence and build a <br />new residence further back on the same lot. The Applicant is also applying for a conditional use <br />permit to permit grading within 75 feet of the lakeshore. The Applicant is proposing to remove a <br />"bulge" in the topography to bring the lakeside of the lot more in natural flow with the adjacent <br />property. The proposal includes relocating the new residence back out of the 0-75* setback area, <br />which will allow It to be more in alignment with the adjacent properties. <br />Bottenberg stated the Applicant initiated this process in April of 1999, when the Applicant brought <br />Page 7
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.