My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-20-2000 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2000
>
03-20-2000 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2023 3:51:26 PM
Creation date
3/16/2023 3:45:54 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. ■ ^ ^ 7-3.------ <br />4. <br />B Adiaccnl property to the south is the Luce Line Trail and to the north is <br />a developed residential property containing a wetland near the no^ <br />boundary of applicants’ property. The adjacent property is not available <br />for purchase to increase the width of applicants property at the 50 front <br />setback line. <br />C.The existing house on the property has existed tlKte for many decades ^ <br />is located less than the required 30’ from the side lot line adjawnt to the <br />Luce Line Trail. .Applicants propose to remove that house and construct <br />a new residence that meets all setbaclc requirements of the City. <br />D Strict enforcement of the zoning code would not allow the existing hoi^ <br />with non-confonning setbaclc to be replaced with a new house having <br />conforming setbacks. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />„endations of the Planning Commission. «Ports by Cuy staff, <br />by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br />welfare of the community. <br />The City Council finds thafthe conditions existing on this property are Pe^uhar <br />to it and do not appW generally to other property m this zoning disttict, ttat <br />granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions. ligW ait ror <br />nose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not <br />se“e as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to a <br />demonstrable hardship ot difficulty; is necessary to pt^w a aubsiaima <br />tight of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br />Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS <br />Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council ^ <br />conditions: <br />5. <br />1.The new residence shall meet all required setbacks. <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />!mmf
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.