My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-19-2000 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2000
>
01-19-2000 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2023 3:54:12 PM
Creation date
3/16/2023 3:44:28 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
394
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 <br />(»7) U2540 BRADLEY HOYT, 2523 KELLY A VENUE - Continued <br />specifically permitted, no hardcover, temporary or permanent structures.... shall be permitted <br />on any land within 75 feet of the ordinary high water elevation.” He asked if Mr. Sheridan <br />understood that. <br />Sheridan said he understood, and also that Mr. Barrett was drawing the conclusion that the <br />retaining wall is hardcover. <br />Barrett said he is drawing the conclusion that it is a temporary or permanent structure or <br />hardcover. He asked if Mr. Sheri jan denies that it is a permanent structure. <br />Sheridan said that based on the City Code’s definition of what a structure is, yes. <br />Barrett asked if he denies that it is hardcover. <br />Sheridan said that is correct. <br />Sheridan said the City is asking for his client to apply for a conditional use permit and some <br />variances. He said that a conditional use permit and a variance are two different government <br />actions that can be taken with respect to use of property. He read to the Council fi’om a case <br />that the Minnesota Supreme decided regarding what a conditional use permit is and its affect, <br />Chanhasscn Estates v. City of Chanhassen. Minnesota Supreme Court, 1984, which states, <br />’3y express designation as a conditional use in a particular zone, such a use is deemed <br />consistent wdth the public health, safety and general welfare and consistent with goals of the <br />comprehensive plan of that municipality. Until the district is rezoned or the zoning ordinance <br />is either amended or successfully challenged, that determination is conclusive.” Sheridan said <br />Orono’s conditional use definition says that conditional uses are permitted and, therefore, that <br />a conditional use is a use permitted in a particular zone subject to conditions. A variance is an <br />attempt by someone to come in and get a variance for a use that would not othervrise be <br />allowed in a particular zone. He said you can’t have a permitted use subject to conditions and <br />say that you need a variance for a permitted use. <br />Barrett said the conditional use permit does not fall under the difficulties that Mr. Sheridan <br />suggests. If you want a conditional use permit, all you need to do is demonstrate that you are <br />in compliance with the city ordinances and the city will grant one. If you wish a conditional <br />use permit when you stand outside of compliance with the chy ordinances, then it follows that <br />unless you get a variance from those ordinances, you cannot have the conditional use permit <br />and that is why the variance question arises. <br />Sheridan said he disagrees for the reasons he has stated. <br />Jabbour said the City asks someone that wants to put less than three yards of sand on thor <br />beach to obtain a conditional use permit. He does not feel it is out of line to ask Mr. Sheridan <br />Page 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.