Laserfiche WebLink
I \ <br />► > <br />Updated 2001 Budf'et and Tax Levy Information <br />August 22, 2000 <br />Page 2________________________________ <br />Building StafF Capacity for Technology <br />Through hiring and training, the capacity to use technology to improve services and increase <br />efficiency has been substantially strengthened. The use of e-mail and the Internet has already <br />substantially increased the efficiency of communication. We are now in the process of implementing <br />an automated database for ail property and land use-related information that will make it much easier <br />to store and retrieve this information. We are continually finding or creating more effective and <br />efficient ways to access and share information, which is a key element of everything we do. <br />Levy for Future Capital Needs <br />At the initial budget work session, the Council directed that the $90,000 of tax levy that is no longer <br />needed for the debt service on the 1989 water revenue bonds and the 1985 sewer bonds be continued <br />and designated toward future capital needs, such as the Long Lake fire station. I'he proposed 2001 <br />budget now includes a $90,000 tax levy in the Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund designated <br />to a separate account for future capital needs. <br />Tax Levy, Tax Capacity Rate, and Impact of Tax Levy on Property Owners <br />The total tax levy required to fund the proposed 2001 budget is $2,443,350. This is an increase of <br />$79,790 or 3.38% from the 2000 levy. The breakout of the use of tax levy revenues by fund is <br />shovm in Attachment A-1. <br />The estimated net tax capacity for taxes payable in the year 2001 is $ 17.451,598. This is an increase <br />of $1,778,743 or 11.35% over the 2000 tax capacity. Based on the City’s tax capacity and the <br />proposed tax lev>\ the tax capacity rate would be 13.761%. This is a 7.06% reduction from the 2000 <br />tax capacity rate. <br />Impact of Buduct and Tax Lew on Property Owners <br />For a home valued at $200,000. assuming no increase in property values, the City’s share of the <br />property tax bill would decrease by $29.35 or 7.1%. For a home valued at $500,000, the City’s share <br />of the property tax bill would decrease by $81.13 or 7.1%. <br />ff'