Laserfiche WebLink
L <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />DEC 1 6 2000 <br />Cl I Y Uh Unuivu <br />DATE; December 15,2000 <br />sO.t 3ITEM NO. <br />Department Approval: <br />Name Paul Weinberger <br />Title Zoning Administrator <br />Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description:#2550 Charles Van Eeckhout <br />120 South Brown Road <br />Class III Subdivision <br />Conditional Use Permit for a PRU <br />Zoning District:RR-IB One Family Rural Residential <br />List of Exhibits: <br />A <br />B <br />C <br />D <br />E <br />TEP Panel Findings and Determination <br />Letter From Apple Glen Road Property Owner (August 21,2000) <br />Letter From John and Mary Dunn - adjacent property owners (September 23,2000) <br />Plat Map <br />Proposed Lot Layout <br />On December 14th Staff had a meeting with Mr. Van Eeckhout to discuss a revision to the lot layout. The <br />revised plan would eliminate 3 lots, reducing the total lot, to 4, 2 with access to Brown Road and 2 with <br />access to Apple Glen Road. The previous application requested an e.\tension to .Apple Glen and access for <br />7 lots through Long Lake. Mr. Van Eeckhout is scheduled to meet with the Long Lake Planning Commission <br />on January 9, 2001 to discuss this issue. <br />While a resolution for denial of the subdivision would be made available to the Council at the December 1 8th <br />meeting, the applicant would like to have the opportunity to present the revised proposal to the Orono <br />Planning Commission at their January 17, 2001 meeting. This option would require the Council vote to <br />return the subdivision request to a public Itearing with the Phni’ing Commission. The Orono Planning <br />Commission would have their first opportunity to review the proposal after the Long Lake Planning <br />Commission has had an opportunity to comment on the issue of access. <br />The three primary issues that have been identified throughout the process have been the w etland boundary ’ <br />determination (in November the TEP determined they agreed with the wetland boundaries as identified by <br />Svobota). the number and size of the 4 proposed lots at the north end of the subdi\ ision (applicant proposed <br />to reduce the number of lots from 4 to 2 adjacent to Long Lake) and resolution of the access to the lots (this <br />will be reviewed in January' by Long Lake). <br />The new plan would remove 3 new building sites fro.m the previous proposal ai d only 2 lots would access <br />Apple Glen, r'^ther than 7. This is an opportunity to develop the 20 acre site (14 - acres dry buildable) and <br />protect the environmentally sensitive areas along die Long Lake Creek and L ice Line trail. Any future <br />subdivision of a lot would require an amendment to the Planned Residential Devi lopment (PRD) in addition <br />to meeting the requirements of the Zoning and Subdivision Codes.