Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT <br />TECHNICAL EVALUATION PANEL <br />FINDINGS OF FACT <br />Date: October 24.2000 <br />Countv: HenneDin_____ <br />Project Name/#: VanEeddiout <br />LGU: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District <br />LGU Contact: Tim Hafher____________________ <br />Phone#: (9S2U71-0S90 <br />Location of Project: T117N R23W 03 NWl/4ofNWl/4 Orono Hennepin <br />Townaliip, Range, Secdon, Q(r. Section, Lot/Block, Chy, County <br />TEP Members (and others) ^o reviewed project: <br />(Check if viewed project she) <br />(X ) SWCD: David Thill_________________(X ) BWSR: Doug Snvder_____________ <br />(X ) LGU: run Hafiier_________________________________________________ <br />Other Wetland Experts present:__________________________________________ <br />TEP requested bv: CMtv of Orono___________________________________________ <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />6. <br />7. <br />Type of TEP detenninadon requested (check those that apply): <br />X Delineation dieck <br />___Exempdon Determinadon (WCA Exemption #___) <br />___No-L^ Determinadon <br />___Rq)lacement Plan <br />Descripdon of Wetland with proposed inq)act: <br />a. Wedand Type (Circular 39)___________(Oswardiii) <br />b. Size of Proposed Impact (tenths of acre). <br />Have sequencing requirements been addressed?__yes___no <br />Is the project consistent with the intent of the comprehensive local water plan and/or the watershed district <br />plan, the metropolitan surface water management plan and metrop>oIitan groundwater management plan, and <br />local comprdieosive plan and zoning ordinance? Yes( ) No( ) <br />S. The project will af'ect the following wedand functions: <br />Functions <br />Floodwater Storage <br />Nutrient Assumladon <br />Sediment Entruxnentm <br />Groundwater Recharge <br />Low Flow Augmentation <br />Aesthedcs/Recreadon <br />Shoreland Anchoring <br />Wildlife Habitat <br />Fisheries Habitat <br />Plant/Animal Habitat <br />Commercial Uses <br />Impact <br />X <br />Nolnmact Improve <br />For replacement plan or no-Ioss determinations, are wedand functions maintained at an equal or greater level? <br />YesO No() <br />Does Technical Evaluation Panel recommend approval of the activity proposed in item 1.? <br />Ycs(X) No( ) <br />If no, why?_________________________________________________ <br />8. SIGNATURES (i/TEP decision is no; a consensus, note •with an asterisk and esqtlain on the back o/lhispage) <br />jO II/8/00 <br />SWCD Rqxetentative (Dtte) <br />11/8/2000 <br />BWSR RqiresenUtive (Date)lepi^atative (D«e)