My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-11-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
12-11-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2023 10:17:08 AM
Creation date
3/15/2023 10:06:34 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
494
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
'>• <br />I. <br />' <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />AUGUST 21,2000 <br />’. 1 <br />6.Drainage casements shall be dedicated on the plat across drainageways and pond areas. <br />7.Utility and Roadway casements shall be granted over Outlet A. <br />8.Subdivider shall satisfy all concerns and requirements noted in the letter dated <br />August 14,2000, by the City Engineer. <br />Bergh commented the first concern expressed by the Planning Commission at the last meeting <br />was the small lot size on the north, noting the consensus was to either eliminate a lot or to achieve <br />bigger lot spacing. Bergh stated by having the roadway as proposed, it wilt create a better <br />roadway sy'stem and affords the developer the ability to spread the lots out more. <br />Hawn inquired what the size of the lots on the north side is. <br />Lindquist stated he would like to know the dry buildable area on each lot. <br />Bergh indicated he does not have the numbers with him tonight, but to his recollection Lot 1 <br />is just over three-quarters of an acre, all dry buildable; Lot 2 is approximately eight-tenths of an <br />acre, with appro.ximately 80 to 90 percent dry buildable; Lot 7 is all dry buildable, and Lot 3 is <br />approximately 30 percent dry buildable but still contains a large dry buildable area consisting of <br />appro.ximately three-quarters to one acre. <br />Hawn noted the City of Orono has received Uvo letters from residents of Long Lake opposing the <br />e.xtension of Apple Glen Road. <br />Hawn noted when the wetlands were remeasured, there was mention made to a ditch that <br />apparently was not there in ! 996 and also to some fill that hadn’t been there in 1996. Hav\n <br />inquired where the ditch and fill came from. <br />Bergh stated he is uncertain of the exact history of the ditch and fill, but a wooden ditch exists in <br />the area, with the creekway having been re-dug, which reduced the water level in this area, and <br />resulted in the area becoming dry buildable. Bergh stated the only fill he is aware of is in the area <br />of Lot 7. <br />PAGE 10
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.