Laserfiche WebLink
WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT <br />TECHNICAL EVALUATION PANEL <br />FINDINGS OF FACT 1 •• <br />t »■ • <br />Date: October 24.2l <br />County: Henneoin <br />LGU: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District <br />LGU Contact JimHafiier___________ <br />Project Name/#: VanEeddiout Phone #: (952)471-0590 <br />Location of Project: T117N R23W 03 NW 1/4 of NW 1/4 ___Orono Hennepin <br />TownAip, Rmge; Sectno. Qtr. Section, Lot/BIock. City, Coun^ <br />TEP Members (and others) who reviewed project: <br />(Cbcck if viewed project site) <br />OC ) SWCD: David TbUl ______________(X ) BWSRj Doug Snvder _____________ <br />(X ) LGU: Tun Hafiier_________________________________________________ <br />Other Wetland Eiqierts present <br />TEP requested bv: City of Orono <br />1.Type of TEP detenninadon requested (chtek ihoit that appt^'. <br />X Delineation dieck <br />___Exemption Determination (WCA Exemption #__) <br />___No-Loss Determination <br />Replacement Plan <br />2.Description of Wetland with proposed impact: <br />& Wetland Type (Circular 39)___________(Cowardin) <br />b.Size of Proposed Impact (tenths of acre). <br />3. <br />4. <br />Have sequencing requirements been addressed?__yes <br />Is the project consistent wnth the intent of the comprehensive local water plan and/or the watershed district <br />plan, the metropolitan surfece water management plan and metropolitan groundwater management plan, and <br />local comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance? Yes( ) No( ) <br />S.The project will afifect the following wetland functions: <br />Functions <br />Floodwater Storage <br />Nutrient Assimilation <br />Sediment Entrapment <br />Groundwater Recharge <br />Low Flow Augmentation <br />Aesthetics/Recreation <br />Shoreland Anchoring <br />WUdlife Habitat <br />Fisheries Habitat <br />Plant/Animal Habitat <br />Commercial Uses <br />Impact <br />X <br />No Impact Iroorove <br />6. <br />7. <br />For replacement plan or no-loss determinations, are wetland functions maintained at an equal or greater level? <br />Ycs() No() <br />Does Technical Evaluation Panel recommend approval of the activity proposed in item 1.? <br />Yes(X) No() <br />If no, why?___________________________________________ <br />8.SIGNATURES OfTEPdedslonU not a consauus, note with an asterisk and etplainonllu back of this page) <br />£L-m <br />SWCDRepreoitttive (D«e) <br />n/85000 <br />BWSR Rgremlirive (Date) <br />//y/? <br />repiwnutive <br />0C>O <br />(Dite)