My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-11-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
12-11-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2023 10:17:08 AM
Creation date
3/15/2023 10:06:34 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
494
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 <br />(#9) #2480 SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB, 725 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH -FINAL PLAT <br />APPROVAL <br />Thomas Crosby was present. • <br />♦ • • • <br />Gaf&on said Aat Spring Hill Golf Club is requesting final plat approval. He said this plat was <br />primarily for the purpose of creating easements over the wetlands and drainage ways of the <br />. property. It also resulted in the creation of two outlots. He said the outlets contain mostly . <br />wetland areas which have now been delineated and are shown on the plat Regarding the trail <br />issue, he asked for direction firom the Council in reviewing the language of the preliminary plat <br />resolution that has been revised. He asked the Council to review the wording of items 1,2 and 8 <br />on page 4 of 6. He noted that the final plat resolution states that all requirements of the trail <br />agreement must be completed. <br />Crosby said that the land south of the plat will be subjected to the conservation easement He <br />asked if Gaf&on has seen the wetland delineation on that portion of the land. <br />Ga£&on said he has not seen it. <br />Crosby said that the City will need the wetland delineation on the separation parcel to attach to <br />the conservation easement <br />Gaf&on said the City would need the descnption of it. <br />Crosby said the trail has been constmcted along Spring Hill. It goes across Co. Rd. 6 and then <br />north on Tamarack where it has been constructed &om the intersection to the maintenance shed. <br />It then goes to wetland #12 and it has not been constructed north of the wetland where Spring <br />Hill would give the City a ten-foot easement. Crosby said that he had hoped that for the portions <br />of the trail that had been constructed and accepted, ^at the entire trail would have been <br />delineated as a two-foot strip either side of the center line. He said he is concerned about the <br />legal description of the trail because it says eveiything south of the northerly element of the <br />shaded area is for use for a trail. He said that if die ten feet is not all being used, a number of <br />years from now someone could try to move the trail. He said that when this project was started, <br />they said they would create a &ail muht .sll/ agreeable within the ten feet next to the right-of-way. <br />He said the &ail agreement is a separa*. doe« jnent, not on the plat. The way the trail agreement <br />has been drafted is that the legal descri^-.i^.. of the trail is an exhibit, so that the language of the <br />trail agreement is really taking the agreement they used at the time of the conditional use permit, <br />throwing out the portions that are no longer relevant and putting it into an easement. He said it is <br />the legal essentials out of a broader, prior agreement. <br />Barrett said that is the document Crosby provided. <br />Page 12 <br />...■--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.