My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-11-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
12-11-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2023 10:17:08 AM
Creation date
3/15/2023 10:06:34 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
494
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3. <br />$ <br />r’ ( <br />.; ■ <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />EQB Rules 4410.1100 Subpart 6 provide that the RGU shall order the preparation of an <br />EAW if the evidence presented by the petitioners, proposers and other persons or otherwise <br />knowm to the RGU demonstrates that, because of the nature or location of the proposed <br />project, the project may have the potential for significant environmental effects. The RGU <br />shall deny the petition if the evidence presented fails to demonstrate the project may have the <br />potential for significant environmental effects. <br />The City Council has reviewred the evidence presented by the petitioners, proposers and other <br />persons as well as other information of record pertaining to the Development. <br />The Citiz,en Petition presents a series of statements regarding the Development that can be <br />categorized into four specific Concerns to be addressed and considered in determination of <br />whether there is a potential for significant environmental effects. <br />In regards to Concern 1 - Petition Statement: “The proposed subdivision will adversely effect <br />the erosion of the steep sloped Erin & Kilkenny soils on Saga Hill...”: and “...the possibility <br />of increased pollu tion to Forest Lake Bay bv runoff directly dumped into said bav from two <br />ravines located on said property (see attached documents bv Barr Engineering and <br />residents’!...” <br />The City Council finds as follows: The City has long been aware of concerns regarding <br />erosion and water quality related to development in Saga Hill, expressed by residents during <br />this and prior applications for development of this 7-acre parcel. TTie issues of erosion and <br />water quality are separate but deeply intertwined. The third related issue is stormwater runoff <br />impacts, and all 3 topics have been addressed at length during the subdivision process. <br />The portions of the parcel which will be disturbed by development activity are located <br />primarily on slopes of 0-12%, uphill from steeper slopes leading down to Forest Lake Bay <br />of Lake Minnetonka. Runoff from the site either is in the form of sheet flows over the <br />relatively uniform slopes just above Wildhurst Trail, or in the form of channelized flows in <br />two ravines, the smaller (“south ravine”) located at the southeasterly comer of the site, the <br />larger (“north ravine”) heading northeastward from the northwesterly comer of the parcel. <br />Botli ravines are wooded w'ith mature hardwoods. <br />Soils on a majority of the site per the Hennepin County Soil Survey are of the Kilkenny <br />series, being primarily Kilkenny loam. The Soil Survey classifies these soils within “Building <br />Page 2 of 8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.