Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 27, 2000 <br />(*U5) #2643 Patrick and Kristen Burton, 2601 Rainey Road - Variance - Resolution No. <br />4571 <br />Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4571 granting a variance to <br />permit the construction of a private driveway through a wetland where no fill is normally <br />allowed for the property located at 2601 Rainey Road. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />(#6) Edward and Carol Callahan, 2545 North Shore Drive - Appeal of Administrative <br />Decision <br />Edward Callahan, owner of the property at 2545 North Shore Drive, was present. <br />Weinberger explained that the applicant was appealing the administrative decision regarding <br />repair to an existing gazebo located on the lakeside of the residence. A building permit <br />application was submitted on October 23,2000 for repair of the gazebo. The applicants had <br />indicated that the building was damaged in the storm of May 1998. Weinberger referred to the <br />observations made for denial in the Request for Council Action dated November 6,2000. He <br />noted the primary issue was that based on the existing condition of the building, the structure had <br />extended beyond its useful life. The comer posts, which are required for structural integrity, are <br />leaning and lOtted. The rafters, shingles and interior of the building are also rotten. Weinberger <br />explained that the building is comprised of four comer posts, a door and window on one side, <br />windows on the back side, and the walls on the lakeside and opposite side from the lake are <br />screened panels. The building contractor has indicated the entire building would need to be <br />replaced as part of the repair. The permit was denied based on the interim procedures for <br />handling storm damage as a result of the May storm. Buildings were allowed to be repaired if <br />they did not go beyond 75% damage. Weinberger stated that it is staffs position that a variance <br />would be required to allow the stmeture to be replaced. There are no records available as to the <br />condition of the building prior to the May storm. The two options available to Council are to <br />approve the appeal to allow replacement of the stracture, or to deny the appeal. The applicant <br />would have the option to apply for a variance if the appeal is denied. Weinberger added that the <br />building is located I'A feet from the residential propert>- to the west and 12 feet from the <br />lakeshore. <br />Callahan stated that he felt approval of the permit is appropriate. He explained that the building <br />was built at the time the house was built on a patio. He referred to photographs which show how <br />the building was moved off the footings about one foot during the 1998 storm. The front part of <br />the building contains electricity and phone lines. The screened sides are "fragile" and resulted in <br />tree damage from the storm. A tree branch also fell on the roofereating a hole. He questioned <br />--------------------— ‘ ^I■!> tiifirr*--—■ ir i nr i-m i i i~iMii laiinran — ------------— —----------—-iii i