11-13-2000 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

k MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING October 23,2000 •(^11) #2620 PAUL PUSCUZZI, 3320 NAVARRE LANE - AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 4548 Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4548, a Resolution approving a variance to allow placement of an accessory structure between the principal building and the front lot line where no accessory structures are normally allowed and 15 feet from the front lot line where 30 feet is required for the property located at 3320 Navarre Lane. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. •(#12) #2621 JAMES BARTH, 3725 TOGO ROAD - PRELIMINARY PLAT- RESOLUTION NO. 4549 Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4549, a .Resolution approving preliminary plat subject to the conditions outlined in the Resolution. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. *(#13) #2624 ROGER OLSEN, 815 PARTENWOOD ROAD - RENEWAL VARIANCES RESOLUTION NO. 4550 Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4550, a Resolution granting renewal of variances to allow the remodeling and expansion of the existing residence to include a four stall garage and additional living space for property located at 815 Partenwood Road, subject to the conditions outlined in the resolution. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. (#14) WILLMAR THORKELSON, 440 BIG ISLAND, AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE Mrs. Willmar Thorkclson and John Waldron, Attomey-al-La\v, were present. Bottenberg stated the Applicants have requested an after-the-fact variance to permit a 12’ by 24* storage shed to remain on this property located on Big Island. The shed is currently located 23 feet from a platted, dedicated right-of-way where 30 feet is required. The Planning Commission voted 3 to 3 on a motion to recommend denial of the variance to permit the storage shed to remain on the property. It was the opinion of the Planning Commission members favoring denial that permitting the storage shed to remain would set a negative precedent. The Planning Conunission members would not have voted for the plan as is, but would fevor the size of the shed be decreased or moved to meet the required setback. It was the opinion of the Planning Commission members favoring variance approval that permitting the storage shed to remain was acceptable because only a small portion of the storage shed was in the setback. The platted, dedicated right-of-way is not and is not intended to be developed street within Big Island and because the building is in the most appropriate location on the lot because of the topography. PAGE?