Laserfiche WebLink
•* •• f-». >. ...........................• • • •• <br />li <br />zoning Files #941, ?945 s #951 <br />August 14, 19S5 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />6. What forr. of ownership is feasible for these tracts? Single or <br />joint? <br />7. What coT.bir.atien of boat storage is acceptable? <br />a) 1 boat ever 16 feet in length only <br />b) 1 boat over 16 feet in length only and 1 under 16 fees, in <br />length <br />c) 2 boats each over 16 feet in length <br />8. Is there a special placer.ent or pattern for dock construction that <br />should be considered for these tracts? The only survey on record for <br />these tr;cts is for the Thitrr.esh property - I have enclosed the survey <br />to assist in your review. <br />a ) <br />b) <br />c) <br />d) <br />limit on dock width <br />limit on widths of boat slips <br />dock location withir. 20 feet width <br />tracts cannot cualify for use of buoys in lagoon <br />9. Use of land tract: <br />a ) <br />b) <br />c) <br />iir.it number of cars parked on land tracts to one ^ <br />no parking a 1 loved or. Shadywood Road for riparian tracw <br />users “ nice, but how do you enforce? <br />other land use limits? <br />The Planning Cc.rrr.i J .sion felt the scope of their review <br />non-conforring use issue. They unanimously aorcert to ; <br />granting of a conditional use permit for the continued ® <br />os legal non-conforming uses. The individual rcsciuticns draftee b> sta <br />include the necessary findings. <br />membership did rot ail agree or. the limits <br />ie tracts. Four of the six members voted to iimi> each c.The total <br />adjacent land owners' tracts without the written consent of the n.fcctcc <br />ewne r. <br />The minority cf two Coir that limit inn th^ dorks to one boat w»^s an <br />unrca.Honabic a-.Kl unfounded. J imi tar ic*:i not ba.sod or sa.cty considerations. <br />The enclosed resolutions have l.-;vn t'.raltcd based or. the directives c. <br />the majority opinio::.