10-23-2000 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r Application Date: 9/20/00 Completion Date: 9/20/00 60 Day Deadline: 11/20/00 i^jictrTING ocr 2 3 2000 Department Approval: Name Wendy Bottenberg Title Zoning Adminstrator/Planner REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CiT y ur* omo/vu DATE: 10/19/00 - # ITEM NO.: / Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description://2630 Gregg and Stephanie Larsen 1380 Rest Point Road Variance Zoning District: LR-IB One Family Lakeshorc Residential District (I Acre) Lot Area: 14,500 s.f. (.33 acre) List of Exhibits: A Resolution B Resolution No. 2217 C Tape Minutes (Verbatim of PC Meeting 10/16/00) D Staff Report and Exhibits of 10/16/2000 Application Summary; The application proposed is two fold. First, the applicants are seeking a conditional use permit to replace existing retaining walls. Tliere are currently three retaining walls within the 0-75' setback. The applicants are proposing to combine the upper two walls as one and keeping the lower one (closer to the lake) making two walls rather than the three that currently e.xist. Retaining walls are considered hardcover, therefore a variance is also needed for hardcover in the 0-75' setback area. The second part of the application is to construct a brick patio on the lakeside of the existing residence replacing a wood deck that the applicant has already removed. The removed deck was 135 s.f. Retaining Walls: 1. Varianceforlandalterationswithin75'oftheshoreline(10.22,Subd.2; 10.55,Subd. 8,10.56,Subd. 16(J]). 2. Hardcover within 75' of the shoreline (10.22, Subd. 2; 10.55, Subd. 8, Subd. 16[L]). 3. Conditional use permit for land alteration (10.03, Subd. 21,10.56, Subd. 16 [5]). Patio: 1. Hardcover in 75-250' zone for patio ( 10.22, Subd. 2,10.56, Subd. 16[L][2]) PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission at their October 16 meeting held what became a confusing discussion with the applicant in attempting to decipher the request and its impacts. In the end, it was Planning Commission ’s intent to start from the total hardcover amount that existed on the date of the survey (5,811 s.f.); subtract out the portion that is existing landscape plastic/fabric (1,727 s.f.) which applicant must remove; and add back the amount of deck square footage that was removed prior to the sur\ ey (135 s.f.). It was incorrectly stated that this resulted in a hardcover allowance of 4,506 s.f. when in fact the calculation results in a hardcover allowance of 4,219 s.f. This error was found by staff October 19. (The incorrect figure of 4,506 resulted from subtracting the plastic/fabric fron. the proposed 75-250' hardcover rather than from the existing hardcover). I