Laserfiche WebLink
• ’4 '••T '» Jr •• <br />Request for Council Action continued <br />Page 2 <br />October 19,2000 <br />#2629 Keith Word ___________ <br />A 6* setback is proposed to the side lot line and the additional 12' of right of way there would be a total of <br />18' to the nearest residential property across the alley. <br />Vacation of the alley was discussed at the Planning Commission meeting. It is the position of Staff and the <br />Planning Commission *he entire neighborhood should jointly apply for a vacation of the alley. If the alley <br />were vacated at some time in the future, 6' would go to each adjacent property owner. Utility easements <br />would be required over the entire 12' because the alley is used for utilities. There would be 12' between the <br />center of the alley to the comer of the proposed garage addition. Typically, staff will recommend a minimum <br />10' setback for lots under */a acre in the RR-IB. two acre zoning district. <br />Planning Commission Recommendation: <br />The Planning Commission recommended 5 to 0 to approve the variances to permit the garage to 26' from the <br />front property line where 50' is required and 6* from the east property line where 50' is required because the <br />east line is adjacent to a platted, undeveloped street. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Motion to adopt the resolution approving the variances as proposed. <br />' • 1 <br />4 <br />-----