Laserfiche WebLink
I. ^ <br />minutes of the ORONO PLAJ'fl^G COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 20,1997 <br />(#13 - #2305 Roger and Elizabeth Olsen - Continued) <br />Schroeder indicated he would have to review the plan. Berg said she would like to see • <br />what the impacts are. Schroeder suggested guidance be given to the applicant. Lindquist <br />asked Aat the hardcover calculations be improved. Berg noted that the Planning <br />Commission must review the application that will be seen by the Council. <br />Olsen said the shift would change the front setback from 35' to 32' and asked if that was a <br />big consideration. He was icibrmed that Lindquist that it was a considerationu <br />Schroeder questioned the need for 4 garage stalls. <br />Lindquist informed the applicant that the City does not like to see any structure within the <br />75' lakeshore setback. <br />Mrs. Olsen suggested the plain eliminate the 10' within the setback that is in question by <br />the covenants. Olsen said he could eliminate 10' from the plan but would lose storage <br />space. Lindquist suggested the architectural design be considered as well. <br />Schroeder moved, Berg seconded, to table Application #2305. <br />Dr. Bill Cottleman, a next-door neighbor, was present representing the homeowners' <br />association. He submitted a letter form the architectural committee regarding their <br />restrictive covenants. He noted their restrictions are rhore stringent than those of the City. <br />He said the homeowners' association would approve the home being more centered on the <br />lot. A copy of the letter was submitted to staff. He said the association prefers to see as <br />much distance between the homes as possible. <br />Vote: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />(#14)^23a^^LEN PETERSON, HAVING AN HsITfREST IN 3355 CRYSTAL <br />BAY R0AIT>V4IHANCES - PUBLIC HEi^lNG 11:05-11:10 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publicatioh'aqd Certificateof Mailing were noted. <br />The Applicant was present. <br />Photos were shown of the pr^erty. <br />Bressler reported th^t-me applicant is proposing fconstruction'bf^82's.f. carport with a <br />decx above it atmehed to the front of the existing residence. Thel^^^e carport would <br />extend 22 oi^.over the existing driveway v ’*h a walkway. This proposall'A^U require <br />variances fpf side setback, lakeshore setback, and 0-75' and 75-250’ sctbackfedcover. <br />JL <br />1