My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-23-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
10-23-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2023 9:34:36 AM
Creation date
3/15/2023 9:29:02 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
439
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
( t ' *■JtJ t > <br />! i <br />1 <br />♦r k' <br />Application Date: 8/21/00 <br />Deadline: 12/19/00 <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />DATE: October 18,2000 <br />ITEM NO.; 7 <br />Department Approval: <br />Name Paul Weinberger <br />Title Zoning Administrator <br />Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Se^ tion: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description:#2610 Jerome J. Hall <br />80 Leaf Street <br />After-the-Fact Variances <br />Zoning District: <br />Lot Area: <br />RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 acre) <br />36,625 s.f. (0.84 acre)OCT 2 3 2000 <br />List of Exhibits:CITY or unwi>ivJ <br />A <br />B <br />C <br />Resolution <br />Revised Plan <br />Planning Report (October 11,2000) <br />Application Review: <br />Applicant requests approval of an after-the-fact variance to permit replacement of a deck within the 75 <br />setback to a protected tributary. The applicant has stated the preexisting deck was not safe and needed <br />replacement. In July, 2000 it was observed the deck was being replaced without a permit. <br />Based on the recommendations made by the Planning Commission at their September meeting, the applicant <br />proposed a revision to the plan that would remove some of the deck located within the 75* setback and <br />extend the deck to the south an additional 2' (which would be outside of the 75* setback to the creek and <br />would not require a variance for that change to the plan). <br />The Planning Commission reviewed the revised plan on October 16th and recommended 6 to 0 to approve <br />the after the fact variance request. The revised plan has reduced the size of the deck to 170 s.f. within 75 <br />of a protected tributary where 174 s.f. had existed before removal of the old deck. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Motion to adopt the resolution attached approving an after the fact variance to permit 170 s.f. of deck <br />structure within the 75' setback to a protected tributary.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.