My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-09-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
10-09-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2023 9:35:34 AM
Creation date
3/15/2023 9:28:35 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
326
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ik^ <br />f » <br />MINUTES OFTHE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, JULY 24,2000 <br />>2600 BRIAN KERBER, Continued) <br />Pctereoh'Kt^ted a hardship in her view is inherent to the land and not the need for additional <br />storage spaa <br />Mayor Jabbour conimbn^ed he would like to see the properties in Orono be as uncluttered as <br />possible. <br />Sansevere moved, Jabbour secondetLto approve the variance to permit constri\ction of a <br />2,160 square foot pole barn and a vamtB« to the street lot line for the property located at 740 <br />Orchard Park Rond, with the stipulation ofeiqe that if the Applicant wishes to exercise <br />his right as presently exists in the Ordinance to^onstruct an additional shed, that building <br />must comply to City standards, and with the undemajiding the Applicant will store his <br />vehicle and trailer inside the newly constructed structurb>v^^ further with the understanding <br />that the existing two-stall garage will be relocated as far baefestj^ possible. <br />Jabbour commented in his view the hardship is based on the land and the <br />his right to construct four structures on his property. <br />ilicant relinquishing <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1, Peterson Opposed. <br />Peterson stated in her view there is no hardship inherent with the land and that the Applicant shoi <br />be required to limit the size of the building to.2,Qfl0 square, feet. <br />(«7) JAMES ANDERST- NARROWS SALOON, 3380 SHORELINE DRIVE - PERMIT <br />REVIEW <br />James Anderst, Applicant, was present. <br />Weinberger stated the City of Orono has issued a building permit to the Applicant to allow the <br />additional remodeling of the Narrows Saloon which includes expanding the bar into the former <br />Minnetonka Photo space, which is now vacant. This property is located in the B-1 Retail Sales <br />Business District in which a Class II Restaurant is defined as a restaurant which serves <br />intoxicating liquor or has live entertainment. Weinberger stated the expansion of the building <br />requires the owner to obtain a conditional use permit since Class II Restaurants are allowed by <br />a conditional use permit. <br />The applicant has made a formal application for a conditional use permit, but would technically <br />be considered to be an after-the-fact application since the ouncr was permitted to proceed <br />forward with the remodeling and expansion of the restrooms. <br />Weinberger stated the proposed expansion meets all setback requirements for the B-1 District, <br />with no change to the footprint of the building except for the small expansion to the restroom area. <br />Weinberger stated the expansion to the restroom is needed in order to make the restrooms <br />handicap accessible. <br />Subsequent to issuance of a building permit. Staff detennined that a conditional use permit Is <br />Page 6 <br />f
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.