My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-09-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
10-09-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2023 9:35:34 AM
Creation date
3/15/2023 9:28:35 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
326
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
: ■ <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 25,2000 <br />(#2596 Brenshell Homes, Continued) <br />at 1021. Behnke stated the berm would be essentially a foot and a half higher than the existing <br />grade to create the drainage swale. Behnke stated the holding ponds will meet N.U.R.P. <br />standards. <br />Mark Kjolhaug, 26105 Wild Rose Lane, Shorewood, stated his company has completed the <br />wetland determination on the property. Kjolhaug commented it was his understanding the <br />wetland in question is not delineated on the City ’s wetland inventory. . <br />Mayor Jabbour stated a report completed in 1997 shows a w etland in the area. <br />Kjolhaug stated they have viewed the site and found based on their study of the land and the <br />type of soils and vegetation in the area that no wetlands exist on the property. Kjolhaug stated <br />the Watershed District is evaluating their information at the present time and will be providing <br />their comments in the near future. Kjolhaug stated the Watershed District has given preliminary <br />approval to their wetland report but would like to compare it with the study done in 1997. <br />Mayor Jabbour inquired what would happen if the Watershed District does determine that a <br />wetland exists in this area. <br />Behnke stated a Type 1 wetland is not counted against the dry buildable area. <br />Kjolhaug stated it was his understanding the 1997 report described it as a Type I wetland. <br />Mayor Jabbour stated if this preliminary plat were approved tonight, it would be subject to the <br />recommendations of the Watershed District. <br />Kjolhaug stated th'*ir determination that no wetland exists in this area was based primarily on the <br />absence of wetland soils and hydric soils, which are not affected by rainfall. <br />Mayor Jabbour inquired if a Type I wetland w ere to be found in this area, whether a conservation <br />easement would be granted over the area. <br />Weinberger stated the City would receive a conservation easement over the wetland, which is all <br />that is required for a Type I wetland. <br />Behnke stated they are subject to the Watershed District’s review and approval of the drainage <br />and grading plan for this development following preliminary plat approval. <br />Mayor Jabbour noted that although the public hearing was held at the Planning Commission, he <br />would allow some public comment regarding this application. <br />Sandy Rasmussen, 1186 Wildhurst Trail, stated the residents in this area do support an <br />appropriate development for this area but not one that would negatively impact the area. <br />Rasmussen stated the issues that have not been addressed in their view deal with the delineation <br />of the wetlands, water runoff, erosi<m, preservation of the natural environment, and the steepness <br />of the slopes. Rasmussen requested the City Council further address their concerns prior to <br />PAGE?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.