My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-25-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
09-25-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2023 9:32:04 AM
Creation date
3/15/2023 9:28:11 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
181
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
*'+ •• <br />Si <br />NHNUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />AUGUST 21,2000 <br />not work the way the developer is proposing and that the project is completed in accordance with <br />the plans ^proved by the City. <br />Weinberger indicated a letter of credit is required on this project, with the plans on this project <br />being required to meet certain standards of the City. Weinberger indicated the project would be <br />inspected periodically by the City Engineer to insure compliance with the final plans. Weinberger <br />stated the developer is also required to enter into a development agreement, which mandates that <br />certain conditions are met on the project. <br />Berg commented that the City does not release any funds on the letter of credit until an inspection <br />has been completed by the City Engineer to insure proper compliance with the approved plans. <br />Hawn commented the Plaiming Commission needs to rely on the advice of their e.\perts in <br />determining whether the drainage for this area is appropriate and proper in controlling the water <br />runoff. <br />Stoddard requested City Staff review further any possible impact to the bluff in this area. <br />Weinberger conunented City Staff has reviewed that issue, with the determination being made that <br />the bluff should not be negatively impacted. <br />Behnke indicated the bluflf in this area does not meet the necessary criteria to be considered an <br />actual bluff. <br />Stoddard stated he would like City Staff to review this issue again. <br />Hawn commented the Planning Commission and City Council are required to act in accordance <br />with the City’s ordinances. Hawn indicated the proposed plan does meet the City’s criteria, with <br />the developer having the right to develop the land regardless of the desires of the adjoining <br />property owners. Hawn stated it is the responsibility of the City Engineer and City Staff to insure <br />that these issues are being addressed properly. <br />PAGE 23
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.