Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19. 2000 <br />(#2550 Charles Van Eeckhout, Continued) <br />development may not meet the minimum standards a NURP pond requires. <br />5. A permit from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District is required for site land alteration <br />and wetland mitigation. <br />6. All easement documents for utilities, drainage and conservation land shall be approved by <br />the City Attorney. <br />7. Final plans for the construction of the roads shall be submitted for review. <br />8. The applicant provides final lot area (dry buildable acreage and wetland acreage) <br />predevelopment. The Applicant shall be advised 14 acres dry buildable is required for a <br />seven lot subdivision. <br />City Staff is recommending this application be based to allow additional time to resolve a <br />number of complex Issues, which includes the following: <br />A. The property owner of Tract G become a co-applicant and agree to allow the property to be <br />replatted If he will remain the owner subsequent to plat approval. <br />B. More detailed engineering data is required to ensure lots will be provided with safe driveway <br />access. The City recommends driveways not exceed a 10 percent slope. <br />C. Stormwater calculations should be submitted for review to ensure the site can treat all <br />runoff. Stormwater will flow directly to the Long Lake Creek which flows south directly to <br />Tanager Lake of Lake Minnetonka. <br />e <br />D. A grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted for the entire site shall be submitted <br />for additional review. <br />Weinberger noted the revised plan does meet the intent of a PRD. <br />Van Eeckhout commented the road access issue is a legal issue and Indicated he is willing to <br />work with City Staff to resolve this issue. Van Eeckhout stated the letter received from his <br />title Insurance company indicates that they are willing to guarantee access to this subdivision <br />via this driveway easement which was granted a number of years ago. <br />Van Eeckhout stated he has revised the plans In an attempt to comply with the recommendations <br />of the Planning Commission and City Staff. <br />Berg stated they would be willing to relocate the road to help increase the lot size of the two <br />north lots, reduce the encroachment into the wetland area, and preserve more trees. <br />Smith inquired what the impact would be if the road were relocated right next to the wetland. <br />F.erg stated any runoff from the road would need to be directed to the other side Into a holding <br />pond and away from the wetland area. Berg commented In his view this would not be a major <br />issue to resolve. <br />Smith commented the only way to create lots of one acre or more was to reduce the number of <br />lots from four to three. <br />Page 10