My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-14-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
08-14-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2023 9:28:31 AM
Creation date
3/15/2023 9:23:31 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
244
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i. <br />f <br />i <br />f. <br />1: <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />JULY 17,2000 <br />and would show up in the title opinion letter at the time of final plat approval. <br />Lindquist stated it would be his preference that a limited period of time be granted for the shed to <br />remain. <br />Lindquist moved, Kluth seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2602, <br />John Graham, 1065 Tamarack Drive, for a two lot subdivision, with the understanding that <br />the storage barn will be removed or a residence constructed on Lot 1 within 18 months of <br />approval of the preliminary plat by the City Council. <br />Smith commented the Applicant may need to look at relocation of the shed if they do not plan to <br />develop this lot within the nc.\t year or two. <br />Graham reiterated the City could require a covenant on tliis property requiring that the shed either <br />be removed or a principal structure be constructed within a certain period of time once ownership <br />of the lot changes. Graham stated that covenant would be recorded with the title and any new' <br />property owner would be aware of the restrictions on that shed. <br />Nygard commented the 18 months gives the Applicant time to look at his options regarding this <br />lot. <br />Lindquist inquired whether the Applicant would like the Planning Commission to vote on the <br />motion that has been made. <br />Graham stated he would like the Planning Commission to go ahead and vote on the motion, <br />VOTE ON THE ABOVE MOTION: Ayes 4, Nays 1, Nygard Opposed. <br />RIAN KERBER, 740 ORCHARD PARK ROADS - VARIANCES, <br />7:51 p.m. - 8:18 p.m. <br />Brian Kerbcr, Applicant, was present. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />A pp| .ui/. npplifnfu^ r/^qiipgling tfL <br />PAGE 16
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.