My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-14-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
08-14-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2023 9:28:31 AM
Creation date
3/15/2023 9:23:31 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
244
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
>-■ <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />JULY 17, 2000 <br />w <br />all land along County Road 6 and Tamarack has been dedicated to the public. <br />Weinberger indicated tlic City Council has recently adopted a new Septic Code that permits slopes <br />of up to 12 percent for mound systems. Previously sites could only have a six percent <br />slope. Both lots have demonstrated two sites on each lot that would permit the land to be <br />subdivided with the new standards and have been approved by the Septic Inspector. <br />Weinberger stated tlic standard drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated on the final plat <br />ten feet along the exterior property lines and five feet along the interior property lines, with an <br />easement and maintenance agreement being recorded with the final plat for the shared driveway <br />access. A certified list of all casements recorded on the property shall be submitted prior to final <br />plat application. <br />Weinberger recommended the property owner pay a park dedication fee for one new lot rather than <br />offer land for a park dedication. <br />City Staff is recommending approval of the preliminary' plat since both lots meet the requirements <br />for subdivision in this zoning district and have demonstrated suitable septic sites. <br />Graham stated at the present time there arc no plans to develop Lot 1 at the present time, although <br />they may wish to develop Lot 1 sometime in the future. Graham noted they have recently <br />purchased the property in September. <br />Smith inquired what amount of time they were contemplating before Lot I would be developed. <br />Graham stated they arc easily looking at five, six or seven years before they would develop Lot 1. <br />Graham commented they would like to keep the existing storage building since ownership of both <br />lots would not change w'ith this subdivision. <br />Smith inquired whether the Applicant would be interested in relocating the shed onto Lot 2. <br />Graham stated they have discussed that, but at diis time have not made a definite decision on <br />relocating the building. Graham stated the building is in good shape at the present time. Graham <br />PACE 12
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.