Laserfiche WebLink
[ / <br />I <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />8. <br />9. <br />Lots 1 and 2 each meet the minimum size requirements for lots in the RR-IB <br />zoning district. Minimum lot requirements are 200' of frontage along the front <br />property line and 2.0 acres of dry buildable area. <br />Chris Pence, On-Site Systems Manager, has approved the septic design as <br />submitted by the applicants. Lots 1 and 2 have each demonstrated two suitable <br />septic sites meeting required setbacks. <br />Hennepin County has requested additional right-of-way to be measured at a total <br />of 50' from the centerline of County Road 6. Most of the requested right-of-way <br />has been previously acquired by Hennepin County. An additional 8 to 10' would <br />be required. The additional right-of-way would be held for a future trail <br />corridor. <br />A Flowage and Conservation Easement was previously dedicated on the plat of <br />Underhill Farms in 1976 for the pond and wetland areas located over proposed <br />Lot 2. <br />According to the title and surv'ey information supplied by the subdividers, no <br />drainage and utility easements have been dedicated along the property' lines. The <br />subdividers would be required to dedicate such easement as required by the <br />Subdivision Code. <br />An existing bam is located on proposed Lot 1 and would remain on the property <br />following recording of the subdivision. The subdividers have requested the <br />building be allowed to remain on the property and be used for storage for the <br />time period Lots I and 2 are held in common ownership. At such time Lot 1 <br />would be sold out of common ownership with Lot 2, such conditions would be <br />placed on the accessory building defining the time period the building would be <br />permitted to remain without a principal building. <br />Lot 2 would not have direct access to Tamarack Drive and would not be <br />permitted access to County Road 6. The property owners would prefer to use <br />the existing driveway that would te on Lot 2. A second driveway would require <br />removal of mature trees along the road. The existing driveway was designed <br />with the orientation of the existing house. A separate driveway for proposed Lot <br />Page 2 of 6