My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-14-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
08-14-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2023 9:28:31 AM
Creation date
3/15/2023 9:23:31 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
244
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
¥ <br />VI: <br />* <br />. ^ * <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />JULY 17, 2000 <br />driveway. Smith noted nothing currently exists in the record regarding that shared driveway. <br />Beutler indicated that was an agreement reached between the two parties. <br />Weinberger stated there has not been anything recorded on either property. Weinberger stated the <br />adjacent resident has been notified of this meeting. <br />Smith inquired whether the Applicant has spoken with his new neighbor regarding his proposal. <br />Beutler stated he has spoken with his neighbor who indicated he does not have any major coneems <br />regarding the proposal. Beutler indicated they have been working c.losely with City Staff to arrive <br />at a plan that would be acceptable. Beutler stated in his opinion this plan is a <br />win/win situation, with the four-season porch allowing them to enjoy the climate year-round <br />without the need for a deck or patio. <br />Smith inquired whether there were any concerns that City Staff may have relating to the recently <br />submitted grading and drainage plan. <br />Weinberger stated City Staff at this time docs not have any major concerns regarding the grading <br />and drainage plan. Weinberger stated Staff docs have a concern with the long driveway u.id the <br />lack of a tum.'’round being proviacd. The Applicant has indicated there is a waj to include a <br />tumarcsMWr u\ ?. proposal. <br />Lindquist inquired whether that would negatively impact the hardcover on this lot. <br />Weinberger stated the hardcover w-as calculated based on a larger driveway that what is being <br />proposed and should not be an issue. Weinberger stated the Applicant is aware that he needs to <br />comply with the 25 percent hardcover limit on this application. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Lindquist commented his only concern with this application was the lack of a turnaround and the <br />impact to hardcover should a turnaround be constructed, <br />Beutler indicated he is aware of those concerns. <br />PAGE 9
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.