Laserfiche WebLink
B.Hydraulic Considerations <br />■*ater discharged from Mooney Lake will travel south through existing conveyance <br />vstems in the City of Wa>-zata before it is eventually discharged to Lake Minnetonka. <br />concern with the discharge of this pumped water is overburdening downstream <br />.. : ancc systems. This potential is highest i-. the discharge occurs when the <br />lam system is already being used to carry runoff from local drainages. <br />f .ze the potential for overburdening downstream conveyance systems with the <br />-y Lake discharge, pumpinf^ from the lake could be confined to off-peak <br />conditions. For example, pumping could take place in early spring sfter snowmelt or in <br />late tall when downstream facilities are at normal water level. In addition, a low <br />pumping rate of one cubic foot per second (cfs) could be used to minimize short-term <br />fluctuations in downstream water bodies as well as minimize the cost of the project. <br />Water elevation records collected for Mooney Lake since 1995, observations of shoreline <br />condition around the lake, and discussions wdth watershed district and city staff suggest <br />that the water level in the lake could be set to fluctuate freely be^veen elevation 987 and <br />988.We estimate that if pumping is conducted beginning at elevation 988, pumping <br />would be necessary every 3-5 years. The infrequent need for pumping is in part a <br />function of the relatively small watershed of the lake compared to its surface area and the <br />role that infiltration and evaporation appear to play in limiting lake level rises. <br />.\ hydraulic modeling analysis was performed using HydroCAD (Version 5.01). The <br />main objective of the analysis was to estimate lake level response to different pumping <br />scenarios for a critical runoff event. The results of that analysis are as follows: <br />•The runoff generated by a critical 10-day, 100-year precipitation event (10.8 <br />inches of rainfall over a 10-day period) will increase storage in the lake by <br />about 380 acre-feet. This increase in storage will raise the elevation of the <br />lake by about three feet to an elevation of 990.9 from a starting elevation of <br />988. . . <br />•At a pumping rate of 1 cfs, 60-70 days of pump operation would be required <br />to lower the lake elevation by 1 foot. <br />•Pumping from the lake at a rale of 1 cfs during the 10-day, 100-year critical <br />event reduces the peak high water level of Mooney Lake by just O.l feet. <br />As a result of the above information, we conclude the following with regard to operation <br />of a lift station: <br />•The water level in Mocney Lake can be set to fluctuate freely between the <br />elevations of 887 and 888. <br />•Pumping from the lake should be considered when the elevation of the lake <br />reaches an elevation of 888. <br />•A pumping rate of 1 cfs is recommended to minimize impacts to downstream <br />w'ater bodies as well as to minimize the cost of the project. <br />Mooney Lake Outlet <br />Feasibility Study