Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />JUNE 19,2000 <br />(MS) ##2594 JAMES R. JOHNSON, 2240 FOX STREET - PROPOSED TWO LOT <br />SUBDIVISION, 8:50 p.m. — 9:04 p.m. <br />James and Helen Johnson, Applicants, were present. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Bottenberg stated the Applicants are requesting preliminary plat approval for a two-lot <br />subdivision of an 8.1 acre site located at 2240 Fo.x Street. The property is located in the two <br />acre zone and will create one new building site. Bottenberg noted the lot division is a <br />front/back lot split, with the back lot needing to be a minimum of three acres. Access to the <br />back lot will be provided off Fo.\ Street via Outlot A. The driveway to the back lot is proposed <br />to come off the existing driveway used by the house on the front lot. Both lots meet all <br />requirements for subdivision without the need for variances. <br />Bottenberg stated the septic inspector has reviewed the septic sites and has determined both sites <br />meet all City and State standards. The existing septic sites located on Lot 2 are conforming <br />systems and would not be impacted by the subdivision. <br />Bottenberg stated Outlot A would be created as an access outlot for a private driveway to serve <br />Lot 1 and Lot 2. Access outlets are required to be a minimum of 30 feet wide to accommodate <br />drainage, snow removal and screening without encroaching on neighboring properties. <br />Bottenberg indicated Outlot A is 109 feet wide, with no additional screening necessary. <br />Bottenberg noted a flowage and conservation easement was dedicated over the wetlands in this <br />area in 1977. A 50 foot corridor on the west side of the property was purposely not included in <br />the easement at that time to allow for future driveway access to the future back lot. The <br />Building Inspector granted the Applicant a permit in April, 2000, to continue the. driveway to the <br />back lot. The City would require approval of a wetland filling variance and the .Applicant would be <br />required to obtain approvals from each of the affected agencies with wetland jurisdiction. <br />James and Helen Johnson had no comment. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Hawn expressed a concern that the proposed driveway is going through DNR protected wetland, <br />which may be setting a precedent. Hawn noted the City normally docs not allow people to fill <br />protected wetland. <br />Smith inquired whether the driveway could be relocated. <br />Johnson indicated the location is based c : an easement given in 1977 for the driveway. <br />Hawn inquired whether this was prior to the time the wetlands were protected and when this <br />wetland was designated on the City maps. <br />Gaffron stated the City did an inventory back in 1974 and 1975, with this wetland being included <br />on the list at that time. Gaffron stated that in 1977, with the lot was split off, the City accepted <br />PAGE 18