My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-24-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
07-24-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2023 9:25:21 AM
Creation date
3/15/2023 9:23:02 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2.Oversized Accessory Structures are regulated by the following table: <br />i <br />'rJ. <br />U’- <br />!■ <br />r>tr?t. <br />I <br />I- <br />Lot Area <br />0-1.99 acre <br />2.00-3.00 acre <br />3.01-3.50 acre <br />3.51-4.00 acre <br />4.01-4.50 acre <br />4.51-5.00 acre <br />5.01-6.00 acre <br />6.01-7.00 acre <br />Maximum Individual <br />Accessory Structure <br />Footprint Area <br />1.000 s.f. <br />1.200 s.f. <br />1.400 s.f. <br />1,600 s.f. <br />1.800 s.f. <br />2.000 s.f. <br />2.200 s.f. <br />2.400 s.f. <br />Maximum Allowed <br />Total of All Accessory <br />Structure Footprint Areas* <br />on a Property <br />2.000 s.f <br />2.400 s.f <br />2.800 s.f <br />3,200 s.f <br />3,600 s.f <br />4.000 s.f. <br />4.400 s.f <br />4.800 s.f <br />Review of Proposal <br />The proposed pole bam is 400 s.f greater than what is allowed for an oversized accessory building <br />on a property. The applicant has stated he would like to use the larger building to store <br />snowmobiles, automobiles and house a workshop. Mr. Kerber also owns a seeding service and <br />would store his truck and trailer within the building. <br />The property is located in the 5 acre “rural” area of the City along County Road 6 and Orchard Park <br />Road. There are two adjacent residential properties. Neither of the buildings would be’fully visible <br />to adjacent properties, and would not be visible to the property to the south based pn the mature trees <br />between the lots. The house, across Orchard Park Road, is blocked from view to much of the <br />applicant ’s property by mature trees along the road. <br />Reducing the size of the pole bam to 2,000 s.f would allow the applicant to build the structure <br />without the need for a.varijmce. Relocating the stmeture to another portion of the property would <br />not be possible .without replacing the septic system, which is depicted on the site survey. The <br />existing system has been determined to be non-compliant due to the 3' separation to the water table, <br />however it is not required to be replaced until2010. Additionjl'testing has been completed to locate <br />a future primary and secondary site on the west side of the* property. The proposed location of the <br />bam would best utilize the driveway. <br />The garage is located approximately 88' to the side (County Road 6) property line. Mr. Kerber <br />would like to relocate the building to accommodate the pole barn location. The only concern by <br />Staff is the garage should be staked to efts.ure a 26' wetland setback. <br />4 <br />Review of Hardship <br />The applicant has submitted a project summary and Statement of Hardship attached as Exhibits A <br />(Application Form) and B. <br />#2600 Brian J Kerber <br />740 Orchard Park Road <br />Variances <br />July 17,2000
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.