My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-24-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
07-24-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2023 9:25:21 AM
Creation date
3/15/2023 9:23:02 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Request for Council Action continu d <br />Page2 <br />June 22 2000 <br />2600 Brian J. Kerber <br />Staff Recommendations: <br />etback variance <br />To approve the variance to re ocate th garage 72.9' from the north property line where I 00' i <br />required based on the follow·ng findings made in the Review of Hardship: <br />•The location of the septic tanks and drainfield restrict the property from allowin <br />construction o a po e barn behind the house. South of the drainfield the property drops off <br />and · s very low the water table and drainage would be a concern. This would also require <br />extensive regrading and construction of a very long driveway to e rear of the propert . <br />•Using the existing drive for access to the pole barn would be the preferred alternative. This <br />d es require the removal of a two stall garage which has recently been renovated · ith a new <br />roof. To relocate the shed elsewhere on the property would not be practical as the garage <br />would r main wi ac.cess to the driveway and out of the septic areas. <br />•The entire east hal of the prop rty cannot be developed b cause it is a designat d wetland. <br />O rs· zed accessory structur variance <br />To deny the vananc to permit a 2 00 s.f. pole barn to be con tructed on the property subject to th <br />findin <br />•A hardship mu. t be demonstr ed to requ re the larger building ·The hardship appears · o be <br />the prop rty owners need for additional storage space. This may be a con enience to the <br />property owner and not a hardship inherent in the land. Staff i� concerned · th the precedent <br />at may e es blished by approvin an oversized accessory building greater than what is <br />permitted by the ordinance. <br />COUNC L ACTIO QUESTED <br />otion to d1r ct St __ to draft a r sol tion for adoption at the August 14, 2000 Council Mee ing.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.