Laserfiche WebLink
A <br />I* <br />r <br />'is <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MINUTES FOR APRIL 17,2000 <br />(#2573 Davi jBlodgett, Continued) <br />Marti Blodgett, 1380 Rest Point Road7T3r«4veigh^anance to construct a six foot privacy <br />fence located in the rear yard of a lakeshore lot7wTTTrth«.xfi^i^t that the building <br />inspector review and measure the fence to insure compliance'^tth4be^.5 foot requirement. <br />VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 1, Lindquist Opposed, Nygard Abstained. <br />(#12) #2574 TOM MICHELETTI, 519 FERNDALE ROAD NORTH - VARIANCES. 9:58 p.m. - <br />10:13 p.m. <br />Tom Micheletti, Applicant, was present. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted <br />Bottenberg stated the Applicant is requesting approval of a height variance to construct a nine <br />foot privacy fence on his property. Since the fence exceeds the allowed six foot height. City Code <br />requires that it meet the side yard setback. The proposed fence will be constructed out of cedar <br />slats and a metal gate on the street side of the house. The Applicant is proposing to construct <br />the fence at nine feet to match the eave height of the house. Bottenberg noted the property is <br />fairly isolated with the neighboring properties being a golf course and DNR protected land. <br />Bottenberg noted the Applicant has relocated the proposed attached garage, which eliminates the <br />need for any variances on that portion of the application. <br />Miche'etti stated he would like to construct a nine foot fence in an effort to address a severe deer <br />problem that he is experiencing with his yard and garden. Micheletti stated he has spoken with <br />representatives from the DNR who have indicated they are not opposed to the fence. Micheletti <br />stated a nine foot fence is needed because deer can easily clear a six foot fence. Micheletti <br />commented he also experiences a lot of golf balls in his yard, which he hopes will be reduced by the <br />nine foot fence. <br />Hawn commented this application is different from the one just heard, but that sight lines are still <br />an issue. <br />Micheletti indicated the fence will be set back from the road 60 feet or something in that <br />neighborhood. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Lindquist indicated he does have a problem with a nine foot fence <br />Nygard commented in his view the fence would appear as a wall in front of the house. <br />Lindquist stated the City’s ordinance allows a six foot fence to be constructed. Lindquist <br />acknowledged that a six foot fence may not solve all of the Applicant's problems. <br />Havm Inquired how far into the property the fence would need to be constructed in order to exceed <br />the six foot limit. <br />Gaffron stated the Applicant would need to meet the 30 foot side yard setback and the 50 foot front <br />yard setback In order to construct a fence that exceeds six feet. <br />Page 23