Laserfiche WebLink
1^. <br />m <br />i* <br />B, <br />V <br />a sufficient justification or hardship for a variance, nor does the proximity to a natural area. <br />c) The lack of visual impacts to adjacent properties is not sufficient justification to allow for <br />granting of the variance. <br />d) Approval of the variance will set a negative precedent. <br />2.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the <br />applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the <br />community. <br />Adopted by the City Council of the City or Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 10th <br />day of July, 2000. <br />ATTEST: <br />Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor <br />STATE OF MINNES C>T.\ ) <br />) ss. <br />COUNTY OF HEN‘..-r:N ) <br />The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of July, 2000 <br />by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota <br />municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. <br />Notary Public <br />Page 2 of3 <br />'l ■liiJfclili