My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-26-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
06-26-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2023 9:18:25 AM
Creation date
3/15/2023 9:12:52 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
232
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL <br />M 2 ^ <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />DATE: June 20, 2000 <br />,: 5^ITEM NO. <br />Department Approval: <br />Name Paul Weinberger <br />Title Zoning Administrator <br />Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description:#2557 Daniel and Judith McAthie <br />1449 Bay Ridge Road <br />Variance Review <br />Zoning:LR-IA, One Family Rural Residential, 2 Acre Minimum lot size <br />Council Action of June 12,2000 <br />The Council voted 4 to 0 to permit the property owners of 1449 B ay Ridge Road to proceed with the <br />reconstruction of their residence and directed Staff to draft a resolution for adoption at the June 26, <br />2000 meeting. <br />Review <br />The City Council adopted, on consent, Resolution No. 4416 for Daniel and Judith McAthie to grant <br />variances to permit construction of an addition to the g" jage and the addition of a second story to an <br />existing one level home at 1449 Bay Ridge Road. The contractor, Michael Hayes Homes, had <br />applied for and received a building permit to begin construction on May 15th. After beginning the <br />project the contractor determined a small portion of the foundation on the back of the house would <br />need to be replaced because it was cracked. Also, some of the joists were rotten requiring the entire <br />house to be removed, except the foundation. During a recent inspection Staff had noticed the house <br />wa.N removed. Subsequently, Staff has placed the Building Permit on hold. The contractor has stated <br />some alteration of the foundation will be required to stablize and bring the foundation to existing <br />code, and some of the foundation to the back of the house will have to be replaced. The contractor <br />has stated most of the existing foundation can be used for the house. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />To adopt or amend the attached resolution.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.