Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, May 15,2000 <br />(#2582 Francis Koubsky, Continued) <br />Lindquist commented the Planning Commission understands that where the roads are platted are <br />not necessarily where the roads are actually located. Lindquist stated the Planning Commission <br />needs to look at where the platted roads are in determining the setbacks. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Nygard moved, Berg seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2582, Francis and <br />Susan Ann Koubsky, 4784 North Shore Drive, granting of a variance to a front yard setback <br />and relocation of access to "Park Avenue". VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />Gaffron stated the neighbors in this area need to look at the issue of addressing, with the residents <br />located on Tonkaview and Park changing their address to a Tonkaview address rather than a <br />North Shore address. Gaffron stated City Staff could send a letter out asking if the residents are <br />interested in making that change. <br />Smith noted that was a staff recommendation which was not included in the motion. <br />Gaffron stated City Staff will pursue this issue further. <br />(#9) #2583 ROXANN BEiSCH, 3436 LIVINGSTON AVENUE • VARIANCES, 8:48 p.m. - <br />Roxann Beisch, Applicant, was present. <br />Weinberger stated the Applicant is proposing to lemove the existing detached garage and construct <br />a new garage, with the existing garage being located over the rear property line and on the west <br />property line. The Applicant has stated a hardship exists in that the current garage has a dirt floor <br />and is located on the lowest point between the adjacent properties, which causes the garage to <br />become unuseable following a rain storm. In the winter months the ground swells with frost and <br />the doors cannot be opened. <br />Weinberger stated the option of filling in the low portion of the property was discussed, but this <br />option was not pursued since it is the only location between the two properties that collects water <br />runoff and should probably remain in order. <br />The Applicant is proposing to construct the new garage approximately 12 feet off the property <br />line, which places the garage ahead of the low area and allows for a foundation or slab underneath <br />the garage This location would allow the garage to remain dry and shorten the length of the <br />driveway. The garage would be located five feet off the side property line. The logic behind <br />requiring at least a five foot setback is a result of the Code requirement to maintain a minimum <br />setback to all other structures of ten feet. The adjacent garage is currently located three feet off <br />the property line, and if replaced in the future, it should be located five feet from the property line <br />resulting in a ten foot separate between the two buildings. <br />Weinberger stated the proposal would require some additional hardcover on the property for a <br />total of 43.4 percent in the 500-1000 foot lakeshore setback. The Applici>i .t is proposing to remove <br />328 square feet of hardcover. <br />City Staff is recommending reducing the size of the existing rear deck. Staff is also recommending <br />approval of the application. <br />Page 17