My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-26-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
06-26-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2023 9:18:25 AM
Creation date
3/15/2023 9:12:52 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
232
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2. <br />3. <br />5. <br />This property is located in the LR-IB Zoning District, where 1 acre or 43,560 s.f. is <br />the minimum lot area. The property consists of approximately .69 acres or 30,063 <br />s.f. <br />The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on June 19, 2000 and <br />recommended approval by a vote of 4 to 0. <br />4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: <br />A.The property currently contains an existing deteriorating retaining wall <br />system at the lakeshore. Replacement of the retaining wall system is <br />necessary to prevent erosion of the steep lakeshore yard. <br />B.The existing retaining walls are located within 70’ of the shoreline but do not <br />extend the full width of the property. <br />C.The existing retaining wall system hardcover is approximately 5 45%. The <br />proposed retaining wall will comprise approximately 5.12% hardcover in the <br />0-75' zone. Approximately 40% of the 0-75' hardcover is the retaining wall <br />system. <br />D. The applicants have agreed to provide a suitable planting and vegetation plan <br />which will provide adequate screening to the new retaining wall. <br />No additional hardcover should be allowed in the 0-75' setback area. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to <br />it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting <br />the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire <br />hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br />convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship <br />or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; <br />and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and <br />Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />6. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow construction <br />Page 2 of 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.