Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />t " * <br />V <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />COnMril McpTIMG <br />JUN 1 2 200U <br />CITY Up Unv^,^^ <br />DATE: June 7, 2000 <br />ITEM NO. <br />Department Approval: <br />Name Paul Weinberger <br />Title Zoning Administrator <br />Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description:#2557 Daniel and Judith McAthie <br />1449 Bay Ridge Road <br />Variance Review <br />Zoning:LR-IA, One Family Rural Residential, 2 Acre Minimum lot size <br />Summary of Request: <br />The City Council adopted, on consent. Resolution No. 4416 for Daniel and Judith McAthie to grant <br />variances to permit construction of an addition to the garage and the addition of a second story to an <br />existing one level home at 1449 Bay Ridge Road. The contractor, Michael Hayes Homes, had <br />applied for and received a building permit to begin construction on May 15th. After begmmng the <br />proiject the contractor determined a small portion of the foundation on the back of the house would <br />need to be replaced because it was cracked. Also, some of the joists were rotten requiring the entire <br />house to be removed, except the foundation. During a recent inspection Staff had noticed the house <br />was removed. Subsequently, Staffhas placed the Building Permit on hold. The contractor has stated <br />some alteration of the foundation will be required to stablize and bring the foundation to existing <br />code, and some of the foundation to the back of the house will have to be replaced. The contractor <br />has stated most of the existing foundation can be used for the house. <br />The variance approval assumed only the roof would be removed from the existing structure and a <br />second story would be added. Also a small portion of foundation would be added to accommodate <br />for the alteration to the garage. <br />Work was stopped by Staff for Council direction regarding whether reconsideration of the <br />application should occur since the house encroaches approximately 20' into the average lakeshore <br />setback and within the 30' side yard setbacks. <br />The foundation remains and is located over 150' from the lakeshore across County Road 15. The <br />building being located into the average lakeshore setback may not be an issue as most houses in the <br />locality are located across County Road 15 and on a hill. The intent of the average lakeshore setback <br />ordinance is to protect views from adjacent properties. The impact to adjacent properties is minimal. <br />The property owner and contractor have indicated there would not be any alterations to the approved <br />plan for the outside appearance and height of the house approved with the variances. <br />■ ■■■ - » ,1 Til -1^ M ilAAani tWl.TV* -;*W. rVt 1 --------------- ^