06-12-2000 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 23. 2000 (#2558 Anthony Patterson. Continued) 15.7 percent. Patt-:r3on stated he will reduce the side entry if necessary. Kluth commented he would like to see the numbers for ha the existing numbers. Hawn inquired why stmctural coverage increases^ he deck is being reduced. Hawn stated the consensus of the Planning Commission is to leave the structupdf coverage at the existing 15.7 percent Nygard indicated the Applicant will need to remove 43 square feet inpraer to reduce the proposed structural coverage to 15.7 percent. Nygard Inquired whether the^ldveway should be removed. ver and structural coverage kept at Bergman stated the driveway was part of thp^rtginal proposal and apparently has not been removed from the calculations. Kluth stated they need to get the application. ect hardcover and structural coverage numbers on this Hawn commented it appeafs the hardcover is less than 43.7 percent. Kluth stated he wo^kflike some assurance from the Applicant that the existing hardcover and structural coverage limits will not be increased. Kluth stated the Applicant will need to calculate the correct nurfmers prior to appearing before the City Council. Kluttyrt^ed. Hawn seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2558, Anthony Pajt^on, 1780 Shadywood Road, granting of variances to lot coverage, and side yard ;^ack, with the understanding that all existing hardcover and structural coverage limits will not be exceeded, and subject to the submittal of a new survey showing the revisions to City Staff for approval prior to issuance of a building permit. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. NEW BUSINESS (#5) #2486 ELAINE ERICKSON. 1270 SPRUCE PLACE - VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 7:38 p.m. - 8:26 p.m. Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Nancy Anderson. Daughter. Jeff Olson. Son. and Al Hirsch, Contractor, were present. The Applicant was not present. Bottenberg slated the Applicant is requesting variances to remove an existing residence and build a new residence further back on the same lot. The Applicant is also applying for a conditional use permit to permit grading within 75 feet of the lakeshore. The Applicant is proposing to remove a "bulge* in the topography to bring the lakeside of the lot more In natural flow with the adjacent property. The proposal includes relocating the new residence back out of the 0-75' setback area, which will allow it to be more in alignment with the adjacent properties. Bottenberg stated the Applicant initiated this process in April of 1999. when the Applicant brought Page 7