My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-12-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
06-12-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2023 9:19:56 AM
Creation date
3/15/2023 9:12:14 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
337
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PIIAFT: <br />V , <br />I <br />i ■" <br />I »^. <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, May IS, 2000 <br />ROLL: <br />The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: <br />Acting Chair Sandra Smith, Dale Lindquist, Janice Berg, Jay Nygard, and VVilliam Stoddard. <br />Commissioners Elizabeth Hawn and Daniel Kluth were absent. The following represented City Staff: <br />Senior Planning Coordinator Mike Gaffron, Zoning Administrator Paui Weinberger, Assistant Zoning <br />Administrator Wendy Bottenberg, and Recorder Jackie Young. City Council Representative <br />Bob Sansevere was present. <br />Acting Chair Smith called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. <br />OLD BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS <br />(#1) #2569 W. DUNCAN MACMILLAN AND WILLIAM WALDRON, 1860 FOX STREET, <br />AFTER-THE-FACT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 6:31 p.m. - 6:43 p.m. <br />Mark Vlev^eau, Caretaker for the Applicants, appeared. <br />Weinberger stated the City became aware in February or March that there had been excavation <br />of a pond iocated on 1700 Fox Street. The pond was actually constructed by the property <br />owner to the south in a cooperative effort between the two property owners. The survey indicates <br />the pond is actually located across the east property line, writh Craigbank Associates being the <br />owner of the second property this pond has impacted. <br />Weinberger staled an after-the-fact conditional use permit Is required, with no variance being <br />necessary for the pond since it is not located within a City protected wetland. Weinberger noted <br />some portions of the wetland are possibly iocated within an area considered to be Type I wetlands, <br />which does require a wetland permit. Typically the Watershed District will review these <br />applications following preliminary approval by the City. <br />Weinberger stated since the land alteration is greater than 500 cubic yards and the dredging <br />occurred over a property line, a conditional use permit Is required. Weinberger indicated since <br />the area has been dredged and not filled, the pond will not impact drainage in the area. Should <br />the City approve the conditional use permit, the wetland shall be subject to a protective covenant <br />Page 1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.