Laserfiche WebLink
f <br />! . <br />- vT.TV.'u D <br />0 '}w •• • ,* <br />'Jll . •-.- w.*v..^o <br />May 4,2000 <br />To Those It May Concern: <br />Re: Assessment Hearing for Webber Hills Sanitary Sewer Project <br />When purchasing our home at 2000 Webber Hills Road in August 1993 we were told <br />by Steve Weckman that our septic system was functioning properly but was non- <br />conforming, despite the fact that he admitted not being able to find our existing <br />system. The purchase order was written to include the cost of a new septic system in <br />the purchase price to spread the payments over the course of the mortgage. However, <br />Steve would not allow the new septic to be installed at the time of closing. <br />In order to complete the purchase we were then required to escrow 1 'A times the high <br />bid estimate (in a non-interest bearing escrow account). We addressed City Council <br />shortly after closing on our home to confirm tha» sewer was not a consideration for <br />the Webber Hills area. Being unfamiliar with meeting procedure we did not ask that <br />the mayor ’s assurances (that sewer would not be seriously considered for Webber <br />Hills for at least 15 years) be formally entered into the record. <br />In the summer of 1994, prior to installing the new septic system, we contacted city <br />officials again to verify that Webber Hills was not a priority sewer site. Again we <br />were told that we would get at least 15 years of usage out of our new septic system as <br />sewer was not even being considered for Webber Hills. Despite the moratorium on <br />the required installation of tagged septic systems, we installed our new septic system <br />because the city ’s decision had tied up 518,000 in an escrow account. <br />In 1995, much to our surprise, a neighborhood meeting was called to discuss sewer <br />possibility. Mike Gaffron told us that 100% neighborhood support was required to <br />move the sewer project forward. Otherwise there would be no sewer for Webber <br />Hills. We (and others) went on record opposing sewer. All indications were that <br />sewer in Webber Hills was no longer under consideration. <br />In November 1996 the MUSA boundar>' was approved and Webber Hills became a <br />sewer priority for 1998-1999 despite significant neighborhood opposition. <br />1 <br />4