Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MINUTES FOR APRIL 17,2000 <br />F <br />/o/S <br />Lindquist moved, Sto^d^ seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2486, <br />Elaine Erickson, 1270 Spruce PTaqg, grariting of a variance to hardcover in the 75-250' <br />setback area and a conditional use permtKo allow grading within five feet of the <br />property line, and further subject to the five cormHiQiis outlined in the April 17,2000 <br />Planner's Report, with the grading and drainage plans bei?lg«^ubmitted and approved <br />by the City Engineer prior to the Applicant appearing before the Cit^'-Q^ncil. <br />VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />. (#2) #2513 CONNIE PIEPHO, 540 NORTH ARM DRIVE - VARIANCES, 6:47 p.m. - 6:59 p.m. <br />Connie Piepho, Applicant, and Mike Molvani, Contractor, were present. <br />Weinberger stated the Applicant has appeared twice before the Planning Commission with a <br />request to construct an inground swimming pool within the average lakeshore setback. The pool <br />could not be placed on the property without relocating a future septic drainfield site. The septic site <br />would be required to be shifted 30 feet to the north, which results in the site being located within 75* <br />of the water supply well on an adjacent property. The Applicants were requested to revise the plan <br />and find an alternative site for the pool. The second plan proposed to have the pool located on the <br />other side of the property. However. City Staff had some concerns about the location of the pool in <br />this area due to the close proximity to the adjacent residence. The Planning Commission tabled that <br />proposal to allow the Applicant and the adjacent property owner time to discuss their options further. <br />Weinberger stated the plan before the Planning Commission tonight is proposing to locate the pool <br />as reflected in their first proposal, which allows the Applicants two options. Option one is to enter <br />into an agreement with the adjacent property owners that would require the Applicant to pay to <br />relocate the neighbor's well should it become necessary to replace the septic to the alternate site <br />This would be accomplished by having money being placed in escrow to relocate the well. This <br />agreement is acceptable to both parties. <br />Weinberger stated the second option available to the parties is for the City of Orono to grant a <br />Page 4 <br />II