My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-08-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
05-08-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2023 8:53:31 AM
Creation date
3/15/2023 8:46:39 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
336
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR APRIL 24, 2000 <br />{H2S61 Walfred Properties, Continued) <br />Peterson inquired exaetK’ where trail goes. <br />Weinberger stated the trail would begin on Olive Avenue and would proeeed up the hill and <br />eonnect the property to Shad>^vood Road. Tlie trail would run along the proposed retaining wall. <br />Sonsevere stated it is his impression that sometimes the City tends to foree trails on properties <br />where they may not be necessary'. Sanscvcrc stated it is not possible to save the oak trees if the <br />trail is located in this area. <br />Mayor Jabbour stated the Parks Commission is requesting that the trail be located in another area. <br />Sanscvcrc stated in his opinion the only safe place for the trail is the location where it is presently <br />proposed. Sanscvcrc stated he would be willing to approve this plan w ithout the addition of a trail. <br />Peterson indicated she was in agreement with Sanscvcrc. <br />Kelley commented he would prefer to save the trees. <br />Flint inquired why the trail could not be located on the other side. Flint commented he has toured <br />the property and there appears that there will be more than ample parking for this operation. Flint <br />stated he would like to sec more green space and have the area be more pedestrian friendly as far as <br />access. <br />Rcincn indicated they arc looking at appro.ximately a 12.()0() square foot building, with the need to <br />address the circulation of service vehicles and other vehicles ccunter-clockw isc around the building. <br />Rcincn stated they arc attempting to keep the parking slope as minimal as possible, which is <br />accomplished by having the parking as proposed. Rcincn stated due to the size of the building, they arc <br />legally required to provide 60 parking spaces. <br />Rcincn stated they arc attempting to have the trail meet the 24 foot setback and the 30 foot setback <br />at Olive as well as try ing to maximize the green space in the area. Rcincn noted the} have increased <br />the green space by approximately three percent. <br />Ma>or Jabbour stated in his opinion there does not appear to be a consensus that the trail is needed <br />in the area proposed, jabbour stated he liked the parking being located away from the residential <br />neighborhood and providing green space in that area <br />Kelley inquired whether the driveway in the rear could be reduced somewhat with the trail being <br />located in that area. <br />Rcincn stated they need to accommodate over-the-road vehicles, which necessitates the wider <br />drivewav. <br />Sanscvcrc inquired whether a small trail could wind around the oak trees
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.