Laserfiche WebLink
3. <br />5. <br />6. <br />The Planning Commission reviewed this application on March 20, 2000 and <br />recommended approval on a vote of 5 to 0. <br />4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: <br />A. The structural lot coverage is increasing but is below the allowed 15%, <br />B. The amount of hardcover in the 75-250' setback area is being reduced <br />from 5,376 s.f. (29.37%) to 5,368 s.f. (29.33%). <br />C. The addition and deck will not adversely affect the neighbors. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br />granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br />serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br />property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br />by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety <br />and welfare of the community. <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />i <br />■ ’ k 1 j ^ ' r-'